Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
07-23-2003, 08:17 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Distribution: redhat9 (shrike)
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
multiboot (GRUB) problem
hey ppls
i have just been using linux for 3 days (very newbie) and i seem to have a problem with my bootloader GRUB. i think i configured (red hat 9 'i389'?) linux wrong in the installation process --> i have 2 drives, with xp on 1 and 98 + redhat9 linux on the other, but i installed GRUB on the xp drive and now i cant boot 98... GRRR
wat do i do now to install GRUB on the present drive and revive 98??????????????
____________________________________________________
i am such a  in linux 
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 03:19 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
Hello,
I've just moved your thread to Linux - Newbie (Member Intro is not a good place to ask questions; in other forums more people will read your post).
How was your dualboot configured before? I understand you had XP bootloader to choose between XP and 98, right? Now you have two options - make all three boot from grub (you only need to add one entry - for 98) or boot all three using XP booloader (but Linux needs its own bootloader, so when you decide to go back to XP one, you'll have two bootloaders - first you choose from XP, then, if you decided to use Linux, you get lilo.grub).
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 03:23 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: VA
Distribution: Slack 10.1
Posts: 2,194
Rep:
|
I think the XP bootloader can only boot one non-XP os.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 03:55 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
It can boot Linux, but some extra work is needed.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 04:06 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0 KDE
Posts: 58
Rep:
|
Don't install grub or lilo!
The way I finally got my system to dual boot, XP and RH8 after the third try was to NOT install any bootloader during installation.
Made the boot disk instead, which I guess you should do anyway.
I found this way was less likely to have any nasty surprises when trying to boot back to Windows. I had the same problem as you.
Been there done that.
It may not be as smooth or pretty as having one of those boot loaders but the floppy boot works for me!
I learned that from this page:
http://www.blackviper.com/Articles/O...multiboot1.htm
"18) Boot loader selection: (Image 1.18)
For my Linux installs, I do not use any boot loader of any kind. They over write the Master Boot record and I would rather not have that happen.
I choose to not install any boot loader here. If you do go this route, you MUST COMPLETE THE NEXT STEP! Otherwise, you Linux install will not be available to use."

|
|
|
07-23-2003, 04:12 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sparta, NC USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 5,141
Rep:
|
Make 6 of them as floppys fail often.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 04:19 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sparta, NC USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 5,141
Rep:
|
Re: Don't install grub or lilo!
Quote:
Originally posted by funkenbooty
Made the boot disk instead, which I guess you should do anyway.
I found this way was less likely to have any nasty surprises when trying to boot back to Windows. I had the same problem as you.
|
 You can boot Windows and not have any nasty surprises? I wish I could. I discovered Linux because of nasty surprises. 
Quote:
For my Linux installs, I do not use any boot loader of any kind. They over write the Master Boot record and I would rather not have that happen.
|
 MBR is meant for the bootloader, isn't it?
What does Windows use that part of the disk for, I wonder.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 04:57 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0 KDE
Posts: 58
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fancypiper
Make 6 of them as floppys fail often.
|
I only made two! 
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 05:06 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0 KDE
Posts: 58
Rep:
|
Re: Re: Don't install grub or lilo!
Nasty surprises meaning :
Installing Windows then installing Linux and its boot loader only to find out that you can't figure out how to boot back into Windows because you are a  at Linux along with lilo, grub and/or dual booting.
I think thats what the original post was referring to 
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 03:05 AM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Distribution: redhat9 (shrike)
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
How was your dualboot configured before? I understand you had XP bootloader to choose between XP and 98, right? Now you have two options - make all three boot from grub (you only need to add one entry - for 98) or boot all three using XP booloader (but Linux needs its own bootloader, so when you decide to go back to XP one, you'll have two bootloaders - first you choose from XP, then, if you decided to use Linux, you get lilo.grub).
|
i have 2 different drives; my grub is on my 1st drive and i can only select rh9 - on my 2nd drv - and xp - on my 1st drv, but not win98 - on the 2nd drv (same drive as linux) and i cant boot anything if i select boot from 2nd drive in bios, so i cant boot to 98 on my 2nd drv
i would now prefer to remove grub from xp drv mbr, and install grub on the 98/rh9 drv to access 98 and rh9 , but if i remove grub, i wont be able to access 98 or rh9.  wat can i do
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 03:18 AM
|
#12
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Distribution: redhat9 (shrike)
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Re: Re: Re: Don't install grub or lilo!
Quote:
Originally posted by funkenbooty
Nasty surprises meaning :
Installing Windows then installing Linux and its boot loader only to find out that you can't figure out how to boot back into Windows because you are a at Linux along with lilo, grub and/or dual booting.
I think thats what the original post was referring to
|
my problem is, yes, booting back to windows, but on a different drive (the drive with linux on it) since my grub was installed on the wrong drive and my 98 partition cannnot be booted (via either grub or bios drive boot setting) as it is on the 2nd partition
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 03:23 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Distribution: redhat9 (shrike)
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fancypiper
[B]You can remove grub or lilo from the mbr by booting with a Windows 98 boot floppy (at the prompt, type fdisk /mbr)
/B]
|
pity i cant do that or i have no way of booting either from linux or win98 on my 2nd drv, and btw would fdisking mbr delete all mbr records and stuff? 
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 03:28 AM
|
#14
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Distribution: redhat9 (shrike)
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
btw how do u pronounce linux - line + ucks or lin as in linseed + ucks?
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 04:04 AM
|
#15
|
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Gentoo on headless; Arch on everything that requires a GUI
Posts: 6,941
Rep: 
|
Linus Torvalds pronounces it lean-ucks
I got an audio file of him saying, "Hello this is Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux as 'leanuscks'." Can't remember where I got the link from, probably off this forum somewhere.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|