Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
And it's not at all like the DOS command line, it's much more powerful. And unlike in Windows, where the command line is considered a relic of the past that's to be avoided, in Linuxtha it's considered just another interface that's better suited to some tasks than a GUI.
thanks very much. i have the site bookmarked. that was probably what i was asking for.
cheers and thanks
I suggest that you ought to start by re-framing your question...
Your objective is that ... you want to re-program an EEPROM. That's it, that's all. Therefore, you are looking for "the shortest distance between two points."
I do not see anything in that mission-statement which "necessarily requires" the use of Linux at all; nor, particularly, the use of "that old computer."
Electrical engineers all around the world are "re-programming EEPROMs" just like yours, and none of them are scratch-building the tools with which to do it. They selected existing, well-tested software that does the job, and then they bought the computers with which to do it. So, you really are not "boldly going where no man has gone before," and you should not take that approach.
You should fully expect the Windows-9x tool to be useless in modern environments, no matter what environment it is, because computers now have (and, operating systems now enforce) hardware protections against the arbitrary use of system resources. Software drivers must be used. Windows 9X (and MS-DOS) had no concept of such things. Nevertheless... this is not an issue that you need to address. The developers of the software tools that you need to merely select and buy have already done all of these things for you.
It is merely a waste of time to do a thing that has already been done, or to bash your head against the obstacle of "the first approach that popped into your head" (when a wide-open window is right next door to it, and you simply haven't bothered to look around first.) We have all done just that, of course ...
i am sorry, i didnt want to offend you. i will be honest, the fact that linux is free is what attracted my attention. that fact that you could have full acccess to "softawre" (if you know what you are doing) is what grabbed me.
i do purchase equipment etc, as its needed. it was something to learn,play with as learning linux.
thank you for replying.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.