LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2004, 09:46 AM   #1
DragonDon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
ModProbe looking for wrong modules?


On bootup, modprobe is looking for some libraries under 2.4.25 kernel directory. As far as I am aware, I am only using the 2.4.22 kernel.

I kind of have an idea where to change this...any suggestions would be greatly appreiciated

My question is...where did the 2.4.25 come from to begin with?

The system was installed from the Slackware 9.1 CDs and has never been connect to the Internet yet (gotta get my NIC up and configured first...).
 
Old 03-27-2004, 01:01 PM   #2
wiBo
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Saint-Georges de Beauce
Distribution: Gentoo soon..
Posts: 193

Rep: Reputation: 30
just mv or delete the 2.4.25 modules directory if you don't use it.
 
Old 03-27-2004, 03:44 PM   #3
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
Before doing anything check which kernel you're running:
uname -a
 
Old 03-27-2004, 06:15 PM   #4
DragonDon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Now this is interesting....uname -a shows the 2.4.25 Kernel.

Yet, in the /usr/src/ only shows a linux-2.2.22 subdirectory.

A locate 2.4.25/ shows the onlin instances under /usr/doc/modutils-2.4.25.

How did I get a 2.4.25 Kernel if there is no 2.4.25 src directory????
 
Old 03-27-2004, 06:28 PM   #5
PolyPerception
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Distribution: Slackware-9.1
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
Go to one of the slackware mirrors at

http://www.slackware.com/getslack

And get

./slackware-current/slackware/k/kernel-source-2.4.25-noarch-2.tgz

Last edited by PolyPerception; 03-27-2004 at 06:35 PM.
 
Old 03-27-2004, 06:35 PM   #6
DragonDon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for the note and I am aware where I can get the source files....the problem is I would have to DL them , burn them to a CD and then copy them over.

I don't think that this is necessary, at least it shouldn't be. I should be able to get this system up and running with the files it came with.

How does one simply tell modprobe to use different files?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/.../modules.dep Ankardo Debian 9 02-01-2011 05:09 PM
modprobe looking for modules in the wrong place? Jaster150 Slackware 20 09-20-2004 09:59 PM
Update-modules: No longer managing /lib/modules/modprobe.conf? geekzen Debian 0 04-03-2004 06:49 PM
Re: modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than lib/modules/2.4.9/modules.d Andy.M Linux - General 1 01-24-2002 01:50 AM
Re: modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than lib/modules/2.4.9/modules.d Andy.M Linux - Newbie 2 01-24-2002 01:40 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration