MESA and libdrm multilib
Hello! I just installed a squeaky clean Slackware 14.0 64bit on my computer and I followed Alien Bob's instructions on how to get multilib up and running. I am trying to install wine and I am missing a few dependencies. Wine told me I was missing Mesa and OpenGL wouldn't be supported, so I downloaded Mesa and unpacked it and ran ./configure and it told me I had an old version of libdrm, so I downloaded the latest version of libdrm and installed it, but Mesa doesn't seem to notice. I have a feeling this is a by-product of the way I installed my multilib, I installed it from the DVD so it would stand to reason that a few things were out of date, but how can I update 32bit packages? Or am I right about any of this. I'm sorry this post is confusing. But I am confused myself!
Let me try and help you help me, this is what ./configure returns from the Mesa directory. Code:
configure: error: Package requirements (libdrm_intel >= 2.4.38) were not met: So, I guess my question is, what am I doing wrong here, or should I just link all my 64bit libraries to the 32bit ones? |
You need to know that mesa 64-bit and mesa 32-bit are separate, and different versions are ok and don't complain. When something cries foul, you want to read the error message and notice is it in ~/lib(=32 bit) or ~/lib64(= 64 bit).
Compiling Mesa and getting everything to work is hazardous to the health. Use slackware packages if at all possible. If you do have to compile and install, use this approach: Quote:
|
This is good information about getting multilib packages built, but I still don't know why mesa is complaining about an old version of libdrm. As to a slackpackage, I can't find one for a recent version of mesa.
If I install an x86 package, will it simply install to /lib instead of /lib64? Should I always install 32 and 64 bit versions of the same software, just for the sake of compatibility? Of course using massconvert32 would probably make my life easier by only having to download one package...but still, it wouldn't hurt to automatically install packages as 32 and 64 bit versions, would it? |
Some developer chose the version of libdrm it looks for. When slackware-14.0 came out, there were updated libdrm and mesa source packages on the disk, but you needed to compile them. As for an updated libdrm, you're not looking very hard
ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/slackwar...2-x86_64-1.txz |
I actually ended up finding that, should have updated my post. Now I'm getting a new complaint from trying to build Mesa from source. As I was warned, it's hazardous to the health.
Code:
/usr/local/lib/libdrm.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format Code:
. /etc/profile.d/32dev.sh **Edit, I reconfigured and now I am getting a really big string of errors, all coming from libdri. Code:
/home/gene/Mesa-9.1.3/src/mesa/libdricore/../../../src/mesa/vbo/vbo_attrib_tmp.h:1031: undefined reference to `_glapi_Context' |
Quote:
I linked you to the 64 bit file, because I only half read your post. That should have ended in /usr/lib64. ?? Here's the 32 bit one. In the same subdirectory, I think is a compiled mesa package. If not, you're very close to it. That link is to the 32 bit slackware-current |
Okay! So I have some little success to report! I was able to find a Mesa-9*.txz package in the mirror you provided
ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/slackwar...t/slackware/x/ And now wine isn't complaining about openGL anymore, now I just need to fix the rest of the dependencies. Thank you very much for your help and for that mirror. *Edit marking this as solved! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM. |