Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
04-21-2017, 12:42 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
MBR vs GPT
I've used the mbr table for years. I never tried gpt table because it seem too complex to use. But now, I have a much better understanding of it. My question is -- is there a performance boost over mbr? I mean can data be read faster and written faster by having a gpt table. Thanks
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 02:53 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Can I have one HD be mbr and the other gpt?
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 03:19 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,251
|
No
Yes
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 04:06 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,223
|
MBR < capacity 2TB = ok
MBR > capacity 2TB = might not recognize all space
GPT > capacity 2TB = ok
GPT < capacity 2TB = ok
Conclusion: It's your call. Make a choice.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 04:51 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,903
|
Also gpt does away with the kludge of having "logical disks" inside an "extended partition" to get around the primary partition limit of 4. A gpt disk can have as many primary partitions as you like. Plus it has a built-in backup for the partition table if that gets corrupted. Plus it will boot under both uefi and mbr.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 05:09 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,251
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel
Plus it will boot under both uefi and mbr.
|
As will an MBR formatted disk (UEFI and BIOS).
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 05:12 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: debian
Posts: 4,137
|
Some bios / cmos / uefi / ... do not support booting from GPT. If you have a disk > 2TB, then you have to use GPT or give up all the space > 2TB. Otherwise the "can you boot it" dilemma makes the choice for you.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 06:08 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Rep:
|
My bios supports UEFI and Legacy modes and there is also an option to use both at the same time. My hd is 1 terabyte. The reason I want to go GPT is because MBR is dated and I hate the extended/logical partition scheme.
Since my bios supports UEFI, I think I can use GPT.
Much obliged to all members here
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 06:35 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGSTUD
My bios supports UEFI and Legacy modes and there is also an option to use both at the same time. My hd is 1 terabyte. The reason I want to go GPT is because MBR is dated and I hate the extended/logical partition scheme.
Since my bios supports UEFI, I think I can use GPT.
Much obliged to all members here
|
I have such a BIOS (CMOS gets no love)
Code:
Machine: System: Gigabyte product: N/A
Mobo: Gigabyte model: Z77-DS3H v: x.x Bios: American Megatrends v: F7 date: 07/12/2012
gpt here.
However, I have not installed using the UEFI selection.
Thanks a lot, now there's "a list". Grr!
"the list":
Code:
ST1000DM003-9YN1 sda 931.5G
├─sda1 8.4G ext4 06e2fecb-69d9-46a2-a3b9-d525df6843ec /
├─sda2 1K
├─sda5 2.8G ext4 694ab374-b4b9-4197-ac12-ea641cb02f69 /var
├─sda6 31.9G swap 5817fe96-3fdb-4795-992b-aba8b53caa76 [SWAP]
├─sda7 380M ext4 accaced2-19b0-479c-b7a8-a0c532c862f1 /tmp
└─sda8 888G ext4 5c59b145-0add-4c41-b03d-beeadf3bd574 /home
and those aren't default, except to me.
I made "/" and "[swap]" and committed to disk. The installer did the rest.
Last edited by Habitual; 04-21-2017 at 06:40 AM.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 07:24 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Mauritius
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 567
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGSTUD
My bios supports UEFI and Legacy modes and there is also an option to use both at the same time. My hd is 1 terabyte. The reason I want to go GPT is because MBR is dated and I hate the extended/logical partition scheme.
Since my bios supports UEFI, I think I can use GPT.
Much obliged to all members here
|
Hi,
GPT was invented so that your machine can cope with disks larger than 2TB. So, sooner or later, everything will have to move. Since your BIOS already supports UEFI, then it's alright to switch to GPT. After all, your system was made to use it.
My advise would be to stick to only one mode. If you use UEFI, you use only UEFI and GPT.
But, to answer one of your earlier questions: technically, if you have a BIOS running in "MBR" mode, you can have both an MBR disk and a GPT disk, but you cannot boot from the GPT disk, you can only use it for storage. I have a PC in that status right now.
And I noticed that if you have a BIOS running in "UEFI" mode, you still can have both type of disk formats but then you can only boot from the GPT disk.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 07:36 AM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habitual
I have such a BIOS (CMOS gets no love)
Code:
Machine: System: Gigabyte product: N/A
Mobo: Gigabyte model: Z77-DS3H v: x.x Bios: American Megatrends v: F7 date: 07/12/2012
|
My setup:
Motherboard
Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
Product Name: B75M-D3H
Bios
Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
Version: F12
Release Date: 10/26/2012
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 07:48 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,950
|
You can still boot from a USB that has a MBR but mount some GPT disks.
|
|
|
04-21-2017, 12:42 PM
|
#13
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,864
|
One way or the other, all of my systems seem to have GUID partition tables, and it seems most-natural today to use them.
I think that you're fairly unlikely to encounter a machine today that might not recognize them – except for the leftover machines in your hall closet.
The only difference between the two formats is expressiveness – and the size of the integers which describe the location of the partitions themselves. If your BIOS supports GPT – and it almost certainly does – I would simply use that. And, as others have already said, I would be consistent.
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 04-21-2017 at 12:44 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|