Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-30-2009, 08:33 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
loaded modules association wrong?
Looking at 'lsmod' output you get 3 columns: module, size, used by
in a laptop I see the cardbus socket get 'pcmcia' and 'yenta_socket' which is fine, but these 2 get associated with the 'b43' and 'ssb' wireless modules. The 'pcmcia_core' is "used" by 'b43, ssb, yenta_socket, pcmcia, rsrc_nonstatic'.
Obviously the cardbus socket is empty. If I wanted to use it for something would the association shown affect this electrically?
Can I prevent these modules doing this (except blacklist!) or is it a quirk of their compilation/kernel/distro?
|
|
|
11-30-2009, 01:55 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,213
|
No, and No.
pcmcia is a subsystem, and you can have more than one card, all driven through the same cardbus system.
b43 has code in case the chip is hidden there, that's all. It isn't I take it.
|
|
|
11-30-2009, 06:35 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 66
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'm unsure what your last sentence means but essentially your "no and no" indicates just let it go. Funnily enough, using a few magazine cover live distro dvds, some distros manage _not_ to do this!
|
|
|
12-01-2009, 06:11 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,213
|
An example might be best. I once had a crappy 486 laptop with a modem via pcmcia card and an external cdrom via pcmcia card. About three other things wanted part of that pcmcia bus that weren't there (sound, for instance, & network). They didn't disturb it cdrom & modem both worked together.
|
|
|
12-01-2009, 07:27 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 66
Original Poster
Rep:
|
right, cheers
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|