Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
05-22-2017, 11:18 AM
|
#16
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 5,573
|
I'm not sure I buy that explanation. Mostly because if what you said was true, the PIDs should be more or less random. Instead the PID of the process with the incorrect date seems to always be within a few hundred of the process with the correct date, indicating that they likely started at near the same time.
Are you sure you don't have a cron job running that's inadvertently trying to change the system date/time?
|
|
|
05-22-2017, 12:25 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,201
|
If you take a look at the syslog message format
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5424#page-7
you will see that the timestamp is part of the message, so it means you are receiving syslog messages from a sender that is confused about the time and date.
|
|
|
05-22-2017, 08:13 PM
|
#18
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: USA and Italy
Distribution: Debian testing/sid; OpenSuSE; Fedora; Mint
Posts: 5,524
|
I definitely don't understand.
|
|
|
05-24-2017, 10:44 AM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: May 2013
Posts: 93
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64
I'm not really sure I understand that.
|
Hi,
I updated my answer, maybe there is some problem of my expression, you could list you question and I will answer that to make this more claear
|
|
|
05-26-2017, 04:46 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: May 2013
Posts: 93
Original Poster
Rep:
|
this is duplicate, however I don't know how to delete this.
Last edited by hilou; 05-26-2017 at 04:49 AM.
|
|
|
05-26-2017, 04:51 AM
|
#21
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 22,702
|
looks like it is a bug in syslog. The entry itself is ok (I think all of them), but syslog has problems with multiply inputs, therefore some logs will be delayed. Sometimes several days. The new, fresh implementations usually works, so probably you need to upgrade. (you can reproduce it on ubuntu 14.04 for example)
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|