Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hi, have some experince using linux. (always thanks to this forum, I manged)
here is my question.
I have an old 486 dx100 box
32mb ram
2.0 gb harddrive
flopy
and CD rom
Bios does not support booting from the cd
I need a linux version to install on this 486 @ 100mhz box, with GUI.
Does anyone knows where I can download ISO ? I found thousands of dead links.
There are several distributions you can install on that computer. if you have a network card install, you can install via ftp, which is what I usually do anyway.
I don't know about other distros, but I know fedora 2 has a floppy iso that you can copy to a floppy disk, boot to the installation screen and choose FTP install.
I would assume other distributions would have this as well. Check with management.
Distribution: LFS 5.0, building 6.3, win98se, multiboot
Posts: 288
Rep:
One of the main problems you're going to run into is that 32mb of ram. Most current distro's won't run on that small amount. In fact, they'll probably refuse to install. With a 100mhz cpu you'll want to go with a light weight desktop, like fluxbox or similar. Maybe something like Vector or Peanut, you'll have to check the system requirements. And most distro's do have a boot floppy available for systems that don't support cd boot.
I recommended DSL "Damn Small Linux" to that gentlemen. Even more apt for your more
limited machine. Recommend the whole thread. Good suggestions from many LinuxQ members.
I suspect that any distribution would work just fine. Just stick with a lightweight window manager.
Installation might be easier for distros that do not use a graphical installer (Debian, Slackware). I can't think of any reason that a distro would refuse or fail to install with 32MB RAM; you don't need much RAM to load the Linux kernel and the essential bootup services, plus a console (I've installed Slackware 9.0 on a 486 with only 4MB). In fact, the installation process usually consumes more RAM than is actually needed to run Linux itself. If you get through installation, with any distribution, you have plenty of RAM to run the distro itself, as long as you're not starting up a lot of unnecessary services at boot time.
X will do just fine with 32MB (X and FVWM run comfortably on a 486 with only 16MB), again, just stick with the more minimal window managers. XFCE might even run well, and it looks much nicer
Distribution: LFS 5.0, building 6.3, win98se, multiboot
Posts: 288
Rep:
Iirc, rh 7.x and rh 8 refuse to install on less than 64 mb ram. Don't remember why, I think it was just some silly thing rh did. I think some of the other rpm distro's may have similar requirements. But you're right, there is no intrinsic reason 32mb won't run linux.
Any distribution will work but you will run into architecture problems because most distributors compile it for 586 or 686.
Use Slackware. Its compiled with 486 by default, so do not have to recompile a distribution that was compiled for 586 which will not run on a 486 anyway.
If you have PCI slots you can get any IDE controller to use larger hard drives, so you are not limited to 2 GB. If you have VL slots, you are stuck with what you have and the computer will be bogged down by the VL bus. I suggest not even using VL the slots if you do not mind slow redraw.
Make sure you specify a lot of swap space because you will need it during compiling programs and using GUI programs.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.