Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:28 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 128
Rep:
|
linux at work
Hello,
I am wanting to use Linux at work and have been able to find viable solutions for all but three of my problems.
I am an IT admin at my job and I need to be able to access the windows 2k3 server farm and the windows exchange server.
I am wanting to get Active Directory working on Linux.
I am wanting to get Exchange Tools working on Linux.
I am wanting to get Nortel Contivity Client working on Linux.
Has anyone ran into these issues? If so please tell me how you got around these issues.
Thanks
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:56 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Kubuntu 12.10 (using awesome wm though)
Posts: 3,530
Rep:
|
If you want to use these specific applications, which do not run on Linux, then you need to use a different OS. If this does not please you, please contact the vendor of the software and as for a Linux version (that should be good for a laugh at least).
If you just want similar functionality, there may well be usable alternatives. You should define your requirements functionally rather than by products which only run on other OSes.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 12:54 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, Fedora, macOS, SLES, Ubuntu
Posts: 327
Rep:
|
I concur. I'm all for linux/FOSS, but if it falls completely outside of your work needs, don't use it.
If you're just rabid at the mouth about it, though... I guess you could install linux, then add VMware workstation and a valid Windows XP install for a virtual machine--or use rdesktop to connect to a Windows Terminal Server/workstation. But that sounds like a lot of work.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 01:07 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KezzerDrix
I am wanting to get Active Directory working on Linux.
|
What does that mean? You want to authenticate you Linux
login against AD? You want to be able to query/modify AD
from your desktop?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KezzerDrix
I am wanting to get Exchange Tools working on Linux.
|
Try wine or cross-over ... that failing, use VMWare client or
VMPlayer with a windows install
Quote:
Originally Posted by KezzerDrix
I am wanting to get Nortel Contivity Client working on Linux.
|
Try wine or cross-over ... that failing, use VMWare client or
VMPlayer with a windows install
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 01:29 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131
Rep:
|
I think it's just going over the edge. If your job is to work with a Windows farm, the most reliable tool to do that is Windows. If you get paid for it, and most probably your workplace hands you the Windows machine you're supposed to use, why deny it? I don't think you're asked buy your own machine and own OS to do the job you're hired for..so it's not up to that.
Linux is a great thing but when it comes to working, getting the job done, it's not about the solution that suits your ideology or what you want to see at the desktop; your job pretty much says what you use, especially if it's about Windows. Don't make your life hard by spending endless hours finding, testing and tweaking some Linux solutions that don't 100% co-operate with the Windows solutions you mentioned; do your working hours with Windows (as it works natively with the other Windows systems), get the paycheck and enjoy Linux at home.
I don't mean Linux couldn't do the job, but if your goal is to do a job you are given, you are handed the tools to do it and have an option to either use the ready-given native solution, or take a non-native solution that's completely up to you to make and have working, you must be clever enough to take the native solution. Changing one machine from Windows to Linux doesn't make the Earth roll the other direction; if you would like to use Linux instead of Windows because you think it works better, you would have to change (nearly) all the other machines as well, to make it generally as compatible and native as possible.
Sorry if it sounds raw..but that's the way it goes. If I had several Windows machines, an Exchange server, AD and such things to handle, and I didn't have to (personally) pay for using Windows to manage them, I would rather get paid for the management and spend lovely spare time after work than spend my evenings wondering how to get Exchange and AD play it nice with my Linux OS of choice.
Even though Linux is good, it doesn't have to be everywhere. Windows tries to do that, and shows how bad it can be.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 05:27 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 128
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yea, thought about using a VM but don't want to go that far, just testing the waters to see if someone else has done this and what tools they used.
Active Directory: create,change and manipulate employee information
Exchange Tools: create, change and manipulate employee information
Nortel: just a connectivity client to connect to the domain from outside of the office.
Anyway, I will probably just stick with windows.
Thanks
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 06:07 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: rhel, fedora, gentoo, ubuntu, freebsd
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
Right ... you need either the active directory tools (that are windows-native, ie: only run on windows) or you need a very extensive knowledge of the inner workings of Active Directory (vis a vis LDAP) to do those first two pieces.
Linux on an AD domain is more and more feasible every day (particularly when Samba 3.2 drops). But it's a complex beast that you're best off avoiding unless you really need it. If you live in a hybrid environment, it's reasonable to live in a linux box and use rdesktop and/or various virtualization techniques to get your windows on, but if you're in a monoculture, you're definitely better off just drinking the Kool-Aid.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|