Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
02-21-2002, 09:31 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Van city
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 204
Rep:
|
LILO or GRUB? What do you USE?
What do you use LILO or GRUB. What are the advantages using LILO or GRUB. I'm wondering why cause I think Im gonna have to
format or what do they call it in linux? My SB live doens't work
using 2.4.9-21 using KDE on Redhat 7.2. I can't install my kernel
or I have no clue how to fix this kernel panic on FS on 3:48 when I try to comiple and boot from kernel 2.4.17. So Im gonna start
from scratch again but need to know which is better LILO or GRUB and WHY?
I also notice that there are more docs on LILO then GRUB. Oh ya
Which boots up faster? LILO or GRUB? IM currently using GRUB.
Last edited by Alinuxnoob; 02-21-2002 at 09:34 AM.
|
|
|
02-21-2002, 09:37 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
Lilo, more documentation and more people are familiar with it... that's why I choose Lilo.
Not sure about the which boots faster.. once it loads up and you choose your OS to boot.. its done.. so to answer your question, they don't boot up fastest.. its the first thing to load if you have them installed, its the OS that would boot up the quickest...
|
|
|
02-21-2002, 09:41 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368
Rep:
|
You should have made this a poll. I use Lilo. I'm familiar with it and once you've become used to it, it's a doddle to sort. Although the harddisk naming convention used in Grub is perfectly logical, since Linux itself uses the whole /dev/hdx thing, I find it easier to continue to do so in the bootloader.
I don't think there's any appreciable difference in booting speed. I use Lilo on my machine and my housemate uses Grub on his - we have almost identical machines - and there's not much to choose. I do like the way that you can change the background image on Grub easily (it's only a XPM file), though.
|
|
|
08-28-2003, 11:03 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: redhat
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
My prefernce is Lilo over grub for the same reasons...more support then grub
|
|
|
08-28-2003, 11:12 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, CentOS
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
I prefer ntloadr  ... If that option is unavailable, then I guess LILO will do
Laugh dammit... that was a joke 
|
|
|
08-28-2003, 11:13 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: right behind u
Distribution: Rh 9
Posts: 67
Rep:
|
i use grub. and like Thymox said:
and there's not much to choose. I do like the way that you can change the background image on Grub easily (it's only a XPM file), though.
its cool. i haven't had a single problem with grub that i would even need to see documentation for - or support. or maybe it's because im so new i haven't messed anything up yet.
m
|
|
|
08-28-2003, 11:21 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04)
Posts: 1,044
Rep:
|
I find lilo to be easier to use then grub
|
|
|
08-28-2003, 11:24 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Distribution: RedHat, Fedora, CentOS, SUSE
Posts: 1,403
Rep:
|
Well, I guess I will be the spokesman (or should I say spokesperson...  ) for GRUB.
I find that the configuration file for GRUB is well structured and simple to understand.
As mentioned in a previous post, changing the splash image or even the foreground and background colors is very easy.
As for documentation, may I refer everyone to the GRUB manual.
http://www.gnu.org/manual/grub-0.92/html_mono/grub.html
As for support... well... Google.com/linux ... and, of course, LQ 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|