Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I was just wondering, but are there any major advantages right now to using a 2.6.* kernel vs staying with a 2.4.* kernel? The reason I ask is because Ive had no success getting my wireless card working until 2.6.* kernels for some reason, but it works fine under 2.4.26, the default slackware kernel. Are there any reasons why I should upgrade to 2.6.* now?
No. There's no need to upgrade to a newer kernel if the current one does it for you. You won't gain any considerable speed or anything. It's wise to update your 2.4 (get the newest 2.4 from Slackware homepage, if there's any) for small fixing here and there.
Other than adding support for a piece of hardware, there's never need to recompile or upgrade the kernel, really. If you want speed, disable services, if you want security, update your firewall and programs which access Internet.
I think the only MAJOR differences between the 2.4.x and the 2.6.x series is:
1. They include ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architeture) which has a wide variety of Sound Drivers
2. It includes SELinux which are security enhancements written by the NSA (yes that's the National Security Agency in the USA).
Besides that there's probably just usual new drivers.
I generally would agree here, if it ain't broke don't fix it. the 2.4.26 kernel is reasonably current, and the 2.6 series kernel is putting me (and many others as well, it seems) through my paces.
If you were into upgrading your kernel a bit, you wouldn't be asking this, but the 2.6 series kernel seems to copile quite a bit faster. And the xmenu config is nicer.
Despite the inclination to say "don't worry about it", and seeing as you have experienced 2.6 already (due to the wireless card), i doubt there is any real benefit in upgrading. I am seeing a more responsive system overall, but my laptop is still running 2.4.26 as well.
Returning to the sentiment, if it ain't broke don't fix it. 2.6.9 seems reasonably stable. (KDE, X and nvidia drivers are giving me grief, but only when i want all their features at once). 2.4 works great so hey, if you lack features under 2.4 stick with it
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.