Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-27-2005, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 475
Rep:
|
KDE versus Gnome - another non-essential linuxquestion.
Hi folks,
I got three boxes here, all run Linux. Everything works, except Totem (it crashes as soon as I want to use it - never mind...)
Gnome runs smoothly. KDE is slow and buggggy - terminal shows, "not-found", "error", "missing", etc etc etc .
I wonder why Gnome is OK, and KDE is not. Do you have the same experience? Is KDE a good and reliable system? Simplicity, reliability and usability are the prioriites here.
Fluxbox is so far the best, but, Gnome is sort of nice when I can stick my USB-pencil in and an icon appears on the desktop - no need to mount anything etc. Its kind of nice to have the dog bark instead of you.
Thanks for your expert comments.
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 06:30 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,196
|
Dunno....
I have listened to a few gurus in my neighbourhood and they recommended KDE. I installed it, and stuck with it. Yes, it gives some errors, but I installed 2.x and upgraded later to 3.2 and I also did a few Stupid Things (tm)
On some other boxes I did a net install from the Debian Sarge installer, and installed KDE 3.2. No problem at all. One of the boxes I did a dist-upgrade (hey, this is Debian, man) and that installed KDE 3.3. Smooth and without any problems.
So I would say that KDE is just fine. If you choose Gnome, it is just for personal preference, but not for technical reasons.
jlinkels
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 06:35 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545
Rep:
|
I'm not a fan of KDE, Konqueror isn't bad but that's all the turns me on. Oh and it has nice Bluetooth support as well! I think Gtk draws much nicer looking stuff than Qt though so I use fluxbox with all Gtk apps, works for me
Maybe you could try having a look at Xfce 4.2, it's a lightweight desktop environment and it's actually not too bad these days.
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 06:40 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 475
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yeah, lightweght + terminal....
OK, I feel the trend.
|
|
|
01-27-2005, 06:55 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
What version of KDE are you running. Also you may have to note that your particular problems could be a result of Mandrake's version of KDE and not stock KDE itself. Mandrake tinkers around with GNOME and KDE so in the process they can cause problems that may not be present in other distros. Also if things are not being found etc by your KDE desktop, maybe there is something wrong with your KDE installation or configuration.
|
|
|
01-28-2005, 12:37 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: Slackware 10, Ubuntu, Debian Sarge
Posts: 53
Rep:
|
Dont remember Mandrake, but in Slackware 10 KDE 3.2 is very fast. So is Gnome.
|
|
|
01-28-2005, 02:55 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Distribution: Slackware, arch
Posts: 1,783
Rep:
|
Quote:
Dont remember Mandrake, but in Slackware 10 KDE 3.2 is very fast. So is Gnome.
|
That's so true. In FC2 KDE is awful and gome is nice and looks like KDE
In Slackware 10 KDE is extremely fast.
|
|
|
01-28-2005, 09:15 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Easley, SC, US
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10, Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 91
Rep:
|
I agree with an earier poster who said that Konqueror is the best thing about KDE.
On my Mandrake 9.2 system, KDE 3.1 was slow, buggy, and extremely crashhappy (I realize there are newer versions; I haven't been interested). GNOME seemed to lack something I couldn't quite put my finger on. I found everything I wanted in XFce4 ( http://xfce.org). Fast, powerful, highly configurable, and slanted toward GTK (thus faster and more stable, in my experience; though XFce runs KDE/Qt apps just fine for me).
XFce's native file manager is a very odd little construction, but everything else rocks. Give it a look.
(Yes, I know, I went way off-topic-- but why not, when there's something that might be better? 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|