LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2011, 02:50 PM   #1
mellowmilan@verizon.net
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Installing Linux on a 233 Mhz desktop with a 6 GB HD and a 4 GB HD.


I have an older desktop with 233 Megahertz processor and one main hard drive 6 GB and a second internal hard drive 4 GB, with only 64 megabytes of RAM. I have installed Windows XP Professional on the main drive. It runs but too slow. I want to wipe/delete the partition and format the hard drive(s) and install a light version of Linux. The computer will be used only for internet and email and light word processing. Can anyone help me?
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:52 PM   #2
jcalzare
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 34
What is your question? You just told us a long story about how you want to install linux, but no real question. Download an iso, burn it, boot it. The installer will let you wipe the drive if that's what you want to do.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 03:21 PM   #3
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,974

Rep: Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623
You are at the limit of a gui based linux distro. You need more ram.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 03:23 PM   #4
mellowmilan@verizon.net
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Which version of Linux to use?

My question is which would be the best "light" version of Linux to download, burn the iso to cd and install. I tried Ubuntu but it seems to be just as much a resource hog as Windows XP on this particular desktop. Thanks for the response. MM
 
Old 03-18-2011, 03:30 PM   #5
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,101
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
Tiny Core

Minimum Requirements

Screenshots


Install
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 06:59 PM   #6
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
ouch....rokytnji's options are al that's left here...and...
Quote:
You are at the limit of a gui based linux distro. You need more ram
MAY be an option...if the required type of ram can still be found...
The CPU and hard drive, check, but you NEED 192Mb if you want to run something more than tinycore...
(downloading an ISO to try THAT one out, tnx rokytnji!)

Last edited by ButterflyMelissa; 03-18-2011 at 07:00 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 07:25 PM   #7
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,974

Rep: Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623
Tinycore, puppy, and slitaz are some good choices but you really are at a limit.

Could try MeneutOS or it's fork of assembly. I have tested them down to 24 meg.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 09:30 PM   #8
DCOH
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Fedora 13/14/15KDE/PclinuxOS
Posts: 95

Rep: Reputation: 16
You could also try Damn Small Linux.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-18-2011, 10:09 PM   #9
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,101
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
More Tiny Core Users screenshots

http://linuxoutlaws.com/files/monomaxos.png

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GBH0N3o8_Y...Screenshot.png

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JfHdX3yJy3...E/s1600/78.jpg

The only reason I suggested Tiny Core instead of Damn Small Linux or Damn Small Linux N which I have installed in the past and ran (in my blog posts) is because packages are old and development has stopped for both. Tiny Core is currently in development by one of the former members of Damn Small Linux development team and their packages and kernel are more current than Damn Small Linux (which will install and run also on your 64mb ram desktop).

Quote:
Current status of the project

Due to infighting among the project's originators and main developers, DSL development seems to be at a standstill, and the future of the project is uncertain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damn_Small_Linux

last release date of dsl-n was 4.4.1

2008

17 June

2008

Last edited by rokytnji; 03-18-2011 at 10:29 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2011, 12:12 AM   #10
mellowmilan@verizon.net
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Smile Thanks everyone!

I will have plenty to ponder and try from all these suggestions. I can upgrade the RAM to 128 on this computer but was trying to avoid having to pay the $50 bucks per 32 mb that Crucial wants for them. I will first try your suggestions. Thanks. MM
 
Old 03-19-2011, 03:07 AM   #11
rizzy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 285

Rep: Reputation: 69
$50?
You'll find it on ebay for under a tenner. It it PC66 or PC100 type used?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2011, 03:34 AM   #12
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
Quote:
I will have plenty to ponder and try from all these suggestions. I can upgrade the RAM to 128 on this computer but was trying to avoid having to pay the $50 bucks per 32 mb that Crucial wants for them. I will first try your suggestions. Thanks. MM
WHAT?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Triple that gets me a second-hander with guarantee. The one I use NOW is something like that, set me 150 back...
I'd go with rizzy's suggestion and look at Ebay...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2011, 03:44 AM   #13
EDDY1
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Oakland,Ca
Distribution: wins7, Debian wheezy
Posts: 6,841

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
Are you talking about 128 Meach or 2-64M because I have a few 64's that I'll send for free if it doesn't cost that much to send.


Does this mean you have 4 slots and can only put 32 in each slot?
Quote:
I will have plenty to ponder and try from all these suggestions. I can upgrade the RAM to 128 on this computer but was trying to avoid having to pay the $50 bucks per 32 mb that Crucial wants for them. I will first try your suggestions. Thanks. MM

Last edited by EDDY1; 03-19-2011 at 03:48 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2011, 05:43 AM   #14
colorpurple21859
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: florida panhandle
Distribution: Slackware Debian, Fedora, others
Posts: 7,345

Rep: Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588Reputation: 1588
I think puppy now needs 128m minimum to work, will have to use older version, possibly 3.01 and do a full hard drive install, with only 64m of ram.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2011, 05:56 AM   #15
rizzy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 285

Rep: Reputation: 69
there is always FreeBSD that would run on OP's system:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO...-hardware.html
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware 12 install won't boot on 430TX 233 mhz laptop Jbernoski Slackware - Installation 22 02-03-2008 05:50 PM
LXer: The 350 MHz XFCE Linux Desktop Search LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-11-2006 08:01 PM
Need a light distro for a 233 Mhz laptop orange400 Linux - Distributions 13 07-08-2005 11:37 AM
233 mhz wallstreet mac laptop mandrake 10.1 install freeze isoman Linux - Newbie 9 07-07-2005 05:11 PM
Red Hat 9.0 on an AMD k6 233 Mhz M2Mark Red Hat 7 05-23-2005 05:24 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration