Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Keep in mind however that regardless of your choice of distro, windows manager, web browser, etc., it is your 500mhz processor that seems to be the bottleneck.
I guess that's possible, but I would add RAM first (easier and cheaper)
I guess that's possible, but I would add RAM first (easier and cheaper)
My comment was based on the OP's observation that:
"My CPU maxs out at near 100% just using it!
(Interesting though it only uses about 70mb of my 256mb RAM)"
As well as the warning on ubuntu.com that Xubuntu will run fine in 256mb of ram, but a 500mhz processor is "too slow."
Personally I would not spend more money to "improve" an old 500mhz computer. If I had extra RAM lying around I would absolutely use it, but it is silly to buy RAM that costs more than the computer is worth.
You know, I'm not sure where to go.
Clearly the OS runs fine until I open a program. I'm not sure if downloading another windows manager is going to make a difference.
Regarding the speed, double check that you have the RAM and swap that you expect. In a terminal run free. That will show how much memory there is total, used, free and also show Swap. I have had times where my swap did not load and things were bad.
OK, would that be the same as the little system resources program running at the top of the screen? It has that information. I'm not trying to be a dick, I mean is there a chance that application isn't accurate?
Also, I'm not really familiar with the "swap", what should I be looking for?
Also, Also, Can you guys remember I'm an extreme newb and don't really know how to run commands. Saying "run free" is helpful but listing the exact phrasing I need to type into the terminal would be MUCH more helpful, atleast till I start to get a better feel for all this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358
It is ALWAYS best to try installing software by your package manager before even thinking of getting it from the official website and manually installing it.
Code:
sudo apt-get install midori
Awesome, so when I type the code it doesn't need any "." or "/" ?
You know what I don't get!?
This computer was a work computer for a medium size business. A secretary used it and never complained about it being slow, then I'm told it was being used as server (not sure how accurate that is) and it worked fine.
Now I get it and it's like watching paint dry.
Oh well.
Last edited by Parallaxis; 05-05-2010 at 09:44 AM.
This computer was a work computer for a medium size business. A secretary used it and never complained about it being slow, then I'm told it was being used as server (not sure how accurate that is) and it worked fine.
The computer probably worked well for the secretary because it was running Windows XP, which of course is 9 years old and has lower minimum requirements.
Also, of course, most people did not use quad-core 8-gb-ram accelerated-graphics computers back then, so 500mhz probably seemed pretty fast when your computer was new.
The computer probably worked well for the secretary because it was running Windows XP, which of course is 9 years old and has lower minimum requirements.
Also, of course, most people did not use quad-core 8-gb-ram accelerated-graphics computers back then, so 500mhz probably seemed pretty fast when your computer was new.
See that the thing.
It was even SLOWER with Windows XP! It took like 10 seconds just to close a window! And then it was like a slow melt away. That's the whole reason I started this move to Linux to begin with. Windows XP was so slow it was unusable.
And they weren't using this computer 9 years ago, it was still in use till a matter of months ago!
Anyway, Midori is a great lightweight browser, but it is still in its early development stages and has a few bugs, glitches, and missing important features.
Still it's quite usable and enjoyable, and loads pages faster than Firefox.
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux 16.04, Debian 10, LineageOS 14.1
Posts: 1,572
Rep:
500 MHz doesn't seem too bad to me. I use a 450 MHz system with 384 MB ram (its max). I used to use Gnome, and have used KDE in the past. I have now switched to Fluxbox (on Debian Lenny). When I switched from Gnome to Fluxbox, there wasn't a noticeable increase in speed. However, at times some applications would freeze when I was doing too much, and the frequency of that has gone down. IE, if I was doing several things, like changing a codec of a file from wmv to mpg with tovid, while typing a letter in OOo, and watching a movie with mplayer --> sometimes something would freeze. This still happens, but less frequently.
So, I suspect that no matter how much you slim down your system, it won't change the speeds that much.
You know, I'm not sure where to go.
Clearly the OS runs fine until I open a program. I'm not sure if downloading another windows manager is going to make a difference.
the lightweight window managers will be faster than ANY of the desktop environments---although the actual speed of an application may not be affected all that much
My comment was based on the OP's observation that:
"My CPU maxs out at near 100% just using it!
(Interesting though it only uses about 70mb of my 256mb RAM)"
As well as the warning on ubuntu.com that Xubuntu will run fine in 256mb of ram, but a 500mhz processor is "too slow."
Personally I would not spend more money to "improve" an old 500mhz computer. If I had extra RAM lying around I would absolutely use it, but it is silly to buy RAM that costs more than the computer is worth.
If the CPU is running at a high utilization, it is because of the number of things it is being asked to do simultaneously. A slow CPU just means that all those things will happen more slowly. To reduce the CPU utilization, you have to stop processes.
I know you don't want to hear this but you actually might be able to get a faster CPU AND more RAM--all for under $100. If we can find out what the mainboard (motherboard) is, we can probably determine what processors it supports.
With regard to your angst about commands, I recommend going to http://tldp.org and getting the Bash Guide for Beginners. Just a couple of hours with this will make your life MUCH easier.
Finally, in one of your threads (we're trying to get them all merged), people are discussing other distros. Ubuntu is optimized to be Newbie-friendly, and not for speed.
The problem with "beginner friendly" distros is that they are packed with useless services and background tasks so the newbie will not have to go through the trouble of launching it if he/she needs it. But IMO less than 1% of users really need most of that bloat.
And I don't know why I haven't mentioned this before, but I have links to two wonderful Linux tutorials in my signature.
If the CPU is running at a high utilization, it is because of the number of things it is being asked to do simultaneously. A slow CPU just means that all those things will happen more slowly. To reduce the CPU utilization, you have to stop processes.
Well I did like M suggested above and opened Openbox with the Xfce toolbar. There was no improvement.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.