LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2006, 08:07 AM   #1
linda
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 222

Rep: Reputation: 30
Install with 686 iso on AMD?


I just built a new computer, and switched over to an AMD chip instead of using Intel after all of these year.

My question is this: I have downloads of several distributions of Linux that I would like to install on my computer, but they were the 686 architecture. Will they still work?
 
Old 07-23-2006, 08:46 AM   #2
JimBass
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian Sid 2.6.32
Posts: 2,100

Rep: Reputation: 49
Yes, they will work fine, 686 is acceptable to install on an AMD system, it won't give you any problems.

If however, you have a 64-bit AMD processor, and you put a 686 architecture on it, it will work just fine, but it won't use the 64 bit addressing the processor is capable of. What that means is you won't get the super high speed out of the 64-bit chip. If it is 64-bit, you'll probably want to get the amd64 installer. Almost all of the major distros have a port to the AMD64 bit architecture.

Peace,
JimBass
 
Old 07-23-2006, 08:57 AM   #3
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
Actually, you may or may not want to install the 64-bit port. While the 64-bit Debian port is my distro of choice, it requires a lot more tweaking than the 32-bit version. I imagine that within a year or so, the 64-bit OSes will come into their own as far as usability is concerned; but, for the time being, I recommend to my newbie friends that they should buy 64-bit hardware, and install 32-bit OSes.

Since you are somewhat experienced already, partition your disk to allow both versions of your favorite distro, and check it out.
 
Old 07-23-2006, 09:54 AM   #4
royeo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
Will 686 work for AMD?

You didn't say if your CPU is 64 or 32 bit. I had the exact same question, so I checked it out. 686 is the architecture for 64 bit CPUs, and that especially includes AMD 64 bit CPUs.

royeo
 
Old 07-23-2006, 10:04 AM   #5
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
686 is the architecture for 64 bit CPUs,
That's not exactly right. i686 programs are 32-bit. It may be the recommended format for 32-bit apps on a 64-bit machine, but it's not inherently a 64-bit architecture.
 
Old 07-23-2006, 06:23 PM   #6
linda
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 222

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
My CPU is 64 X2 4200. I think I'm going to do what rickh suggested, and try both, since I already have the cd's for the 32-bit. Thanks for the suggestion!
 
Old 07-23-2006, 06:26 PM   #7
Electro
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
64-bit programs only works best in games, image editing, video editing, sound editing, multimedia playback. Other 64-bit programs provides no performance except what I previously listed. In some cases 64-bit programs perform worst than 32-bit programes. Though an 64-bit OS provides 4 GB or more memory with out any needed workarounds instead 32-bit OS which needs PAE to handle 4 GB or more memory. I suggest waiting until 2010 for 64-bit computing to become a lot better than it is now.
 
Old 07-23-2006, 09:49 PM   #8
JimBass
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian Sid 2.6.32
Posts: 2,100

Rep: Reputation: 49
I have the exact same processor! Excellent power in it. I suggest you install the multiprocessor version of the kernel, as it allows the X2 processors to show up as 2 processors instead of 1.

Code:
jim@JimsBeastie:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 15
model           : 43
model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
stepping        : 1
cpu MHz         : 2200.205
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 1
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips        : 4402.72
TLB size        : 1024 4K pages
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 15
model           : 43
model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
stepping        : 1
cpu MHz         : 2200.205
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 1
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips        : 4400.61
TLB size        : 1024 4K pages
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
Your installer will likely autodetect the need for the multiprocessor kernel, but my Debian install didn't. I had to add the smp kernel myself. Slack may or may not, I don't know.

Peace,
Jim
 
Old 07-23-2006, 10:33 PM   #9
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by royeo
You didn't say if your CPU is 64 or 32 bit. I had the exact same question, so I checked it out. 686 is the architecture for 64 bit CPUs
686 is 32bit, as rickh said. In particular, it's for Pentium II and later processors (including all Celerons). I think Pentium Pro may also work with 686.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trying to install kernel-image-2.4-686-smp Cataract Debian 4 04-01-2006 01:37 PM
Install on a AMD 64? carlosinfl Slackware - Installation 5 12-29-2005 03:17 PM
Does anyone Know how to open either .iso.rz or these .iso.xdelta,.iso.bz2,.iso.lzma?? maximalred Debian 5 06-09-2004 06:15 AM
Sarge Install - Kernel 2.6.5-1 686 ?? Matdess Linux - Newbie 3 06-02-2004 02:58 PM
is i386 iso image suitable for AMD processor? w0000422 Linux - General 6 01-14-2004 06:28 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration