Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
09-14-2009, 02:36 AM
|
#31
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 228
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlliagre
What do you need to run on that (virtualized) UltraSPARC platform ?
As far as I know, qemu doesn't emulate UltraSPARC (64 bit) but only 32 bit SPARC.
|
Thank you so much for your reply . Can you please do me favor and let me know if here is an solution to "Virtualize" UltraSPARC plat on Intel-based plat ? I found the Virtualbox as an solution to install guest OS on host OS . To this end , I can install Solaris guest on Windows host . But I need to run UltraSPARC Solaris . Is there any solution in this regard ?
Thank you in advance
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 02:56 AM
|
#32
|
ELF Statifier author
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 676
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlliagre
What do you need to run on that (virtualized) UltraSPARC platform ?
As far as I know, qemu doesn't emulate UltraSPARC (64 bit) but only 32 bit SPARC.
|
Ooops, my bad. I knew that qemu support sparc, but missed that UltraSparc is something different
|
|
|
01-14-2010, 02:34 AM
|
#33
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
RedHat Linux 7.2 Enigma compatibility with 4CPU server machine?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wim Sturkenboom
Your hardware might be to modern? It comes from the time of PII and early PIII computers and you definitely will have problems installing on modern hardware.
|
hi Guys,
I am new to this forum and looking for the info whether REDHAT LINUX 7.2 Enigma will be compatible with a 4CPU server or more?
appreciate if anyone can give me this info. If there is any old discussions, appreciate if there is anyone can point me there. I have tried to search but to no avail.
Thanks,
william
|
|
|
01-14-2010, 03:24 AM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,638
Rep: 
|
I am doubtful if RH7.2 is the distribution that you want and should deploy. It is so old, not many RH guys would remember it using. You should be looking at something that is current. Like RHEL5.4 or CentOS5.4 Final if you want to keep up with Red hat.
|
|
|
01-14-2010, 06:25 PM
|
#36
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 27,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by william20122
hi Guys,
I am new to this forum and looking for the info whether REDHAT LINUX 7.2 Enigma will be compatible with a 4CPU server or more?
appreciate if anyone can give me this info. If there is any old discussions, appreciate if there is anyone can point me there. I have tried to search but to no avail.
Thanks,
william
|
Please open your own thread, for your own questions. Don't tack them on to a thread that's been closed for months.
And RH7.2 is ancient. Highly doubtful it would support any newer hardware, and if it did, probably would get some interesting results. Kinda like trying to install Windows 3.1 on an 64bit CPU.
In my opinion, I'd never deploy anything that old...lots of speed and security improvements have been made over the years, along with the new hardware support. Add to that, the fact that any new software you'd want to deploy, probably wouldn't, since everything you're running is hopelessly out of date.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 09:59 PM
|
#37
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
Please open your own thread, for your own questions. Don't tack them on to a thread that's been closed for months.
And RH7.2 is ancient. Highly doubtful it would support any newer hardware, and if it did, probably would get some interesting results. Kinda like trying to install Windows 3.1 on an 64bit CPU.
In my opinion, I'd never deploy anything that old...lots of speed and security improvements have been made over the years, along with the new hardware support. Add to that, the fact that any new software you'd want to deploy, probably wouldn't, since everything you're running is hopelessly out of date.
|
hi,
yes, i am aware that RH7.2 is totally outdated, but this is one of the requirement for our hardware migration as there is one in-house application that was previously developed for RH7.2 and that is the only version it will run. So, if anyone had ever install this OS on a 4CPU 32-bit hardware or above, would appreciate for the sharing.
Thanks again all.
rgds,
William
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 11:09 PM
|
#38
|
LQ Muse
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,685
|
Quote:
as there is one in-house application that was previously developed for RH7.2 and that is the only version it will run.
|
update that application - there is "no,if,and's or buts".
Think of it this way .
TRY to Install Windows 95 or 3.1 on your new 4 cpu servers and try to run a Windows 3.1 or 95 app .
installing RH 7.2 and running a RH 7.2 app will be just as hard as doing that for a very old Windows one
very hard and edging on the imposable .
about the only way i could think of it to install the current RHEL 5.4 and run RH 7.2 as a virtual system.
|
|
|
01-19-2010, 01:42 AM
|
#39
|
ELF Statifier author
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 676
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by william20122
hi,
yes, i am aware that RH7.2 is totally outdated, but this is one of the requirement for our hardware migration as there is one in-house application that was previously developed for RH7.2 and that is the only version it will run. So, if anyone had ever install this OS on a 4CPU 32-bit hardware or above, would appreciate for the sharing.
Thanks again all.
rgds,
William
|
You can try use Ermine ( http://magicErmine.com) or statifier ( http://statifier.sf.net) on your RH7.2 box to convert that application to self-containing executable.
This executable should run on any other modern Linux.
Another option is install RH7.2 on your new server as virtual machine
(VirtualBox, VMWare - whatever)
|
|
|
01-19-2010, 03:49 AM
|
#40
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,638
Rep: 
|
Those two are excellent solutions Valery.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|