Latest LQ Deal: Linux Power User Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2012, 08:04 PM   #16
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,914

Rep: Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999

I had forgotten about all those "Excel spreadsheets" and the like which won't easily convert. For business I think many have invested millions in Windows only systems from the likes of Exchange and document management systems to pathetic junk CRM and server config systems which rely on ActiveX* so they don't have any choice but to stay on the treadmill. I know a place I worked gave some (OK a little) serious thought to Linux for leverage against MS if nothing else but lazy good-for-nothing companies* making Windows only software put that to bed pretty damn quick.

*I have nothing against developers who work on Windows, and admit Windows has its plus points, but these IE6-only ActiveX junk controls and Microsoft-only database API "because the front end can be written in VB" applications are written by marketing departments and don't do anyone any favours since they can't even survive a Windows upgrade unscathed.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 03-22-2012, 10:38 PM   #17
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: OpenSUSE
Posts: 1,396
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 166Reputation: 166
Originally Posted by Mr. Alex View Post
I got something for ya. Imrove our kernel. It's getting fat and slow. Stability is also decreasing.
I've no issues with the stability, and as for fat, i don't know what that means. Obviously as it supports more and more hardware, the code is going to get bigger.
In addition to this, one thing i'd like to see improved is the power regression that began at 2.6.38 and is getting worse. I am not connected to the power grid, so my main computers are all laptops, and the power drainage can be very annoying. If i got decent battery length on my apple laptop, i'd remove OsX completely off of it.
Old 03-22-2012, 11:48 PM   #18
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks man!!!
Old 03-23-2012, 04:47 AM   #19
Mr. Alex
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Originally Posted by Thor_2.0 View Post
Hmm, personally, I've always been in favor of an in-place on the spot compile of the kernel, with only those trimmings that are called for. But, that may increase the install time by hours...
I wasn't talking about this.
If you translate it with say Google,

TIME ONLINE: Mr. Torvalds, you said recently during a panel discussion that you were worried about the complexity of Linux. What do you mean?

Linus Torvalds: There are some parts in the source code of Linux, who know very few people really well. Last week discussed the three people who know best of all with a certain subsystem of Linux, a mistake. It took days to agree how this error could occur at all. It is unlikely that he ever makes real problems, because you do already have exotic things, so that it occurs at all. And the funny thing was that it existed for five years. But it is an example of a subsystem, for which there are only a handful of people.

TIME ONLINE: Would you say that Linux has become too complex?

Torvalds: It's not a "now". The complexity has always been my concern. The first Linux version had 10,000 lines of code. Today we have around 15 million lines. Long, there are even sub-systems, which have become very complicated. I await with trepidation the day when we have a bug that no one can understand more. We need to make it easier.
Old 03-23-2012, 04:52 AM   #20
Mr. Alex
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Originally Posted by Knightron View Post
I've no issues with the stability, and as for fat, i don't know what that means. Obviously as it supports more and more hardware, the code is going to get bigger.
What about CFS? It's everybody's complain these days.
Old 03-23-2012, 06:35 AM   #21
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,728

Rep: Reputation: 754Reputation: 754Reputation: 754Reputation: 754Reputation: 754Reputation: 754Reputation: 754
Originally Posted by SaurabhJain View Post
Can you guys enlist the areas where we need to take efforts to make Linux even better?
By emphasizing on specific points we channelize our focus.
Excuse me, but if you don't put in more than 26 words to explain what you intention is, are you really serious about willing to put some effort in improving Linux? This question is so demonstrating that you haven't looked in depth into anything Linux related that I heavily doubt the sincerity of this question.

It makes about the same sense as asked "how can we improve the Gross National Product in Africa?"

3 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-24-2012, 06:38 AM   #22
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,699
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 405Reputation: 405Reputation: 405Reputation: 405Reputation: 405
@Mr Alex

Of course the Kernel got bigger, because it's a far cry from what it was way back when. But then, it has to cater for some exotic stuff...would'nt an in-place compile do away with the not-locally-needed stuff by simply not compiling it in in the first place?

Of course, this is a gray-ish area for me, so any feedback is welcome...I'm here to learn ya know
Old 03-24-2012, 09:49 AM   #23
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340
So far every installation I have done works fine. There are pieces of hardware that has no support because they are proprietary e.g. Broadcom Ethernet cards and such. So one should expect problems running Linux in that hardware but again is not because the software is bad. I blame all in proprietary licensing.
Which is also the reason of many non compatible apps

Good luck to you!
Old 03-24-2012, 09:42 PM   #24
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: UBUNTU 5.10 since Jul-18,2006 on Intel 820 DC
Posts: 855

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
In a way, I agree with jlinkels.

This seems more like a general question, responses to which will be used in a seminar or something like that to look good.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
improving the linux experiance slow learner Linux - General 6 06-04-2010 07:41 PM
LXer: Linux: Improving kswapd LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-07-2007 06:11 PM
Improving Linux Skills DanTaylor Linux - Newbie 7 01-22-2006 07:54 AM
Improving linux skill? dratix General 4 11-21-2005 03:37 AM
ATI improving support for Linux ababkin Linux - Hardware 2 04-04-2004 12:56 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration