Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
08-09-2012, 04:20 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Rep: 
|
I need a LINUX install for a Pentium Laptop
I am trying to convert a Compaq Laptop to a Linux appliance. 114K of memory and a Pentium MMX processor. Can it be done?
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 04:24 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
|
a pentium with 114K? don't you mean 114M?
even 486 computers often came with up to 4 Megs
yes it can be done, but you won't get much out of it.
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 05:18 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
Everyone has their favorite small distro.
DSL (damn small linux) has a few choices that might be worth a look at. Slitaz and antix might also be worth a try. See if puppy linux might work.
There some text based and maybe even a BSD that would work.
Last edited by jefro; 08-09-2012 at 07:41 PM.
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 05:33 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667
|
Why? What is your goal with such old underpowered hardware?
Have you considered simply purchasing new hardware? For example a Raspberry Pi costs $25 and has 700mhz processor, 256mb RAM, and can playback good-quality video. http://www.raspberrypi.org/
If you ask your friends/family/coworkers you can probably find a pretty decent machine for free. I recently got two dual-core computers with Windows Vista as hand-me-downs from relatives who simply purchased a new computer to get Windows 7 rather than try to upgrade. (Of course I wiped Vista and replaced it with Linux.) Windows XP computers are easy to find on Freecycle or in the trash. Your Pentium MMX was probably what, Windows 95 originally?
Last edited by snowday; 08-09-2012 at 05:36 PM.
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 05:49 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Such a machine can easily be setup as a terminal to access other machines via SSH or can act itself as a small file- or web-server or may be a jukebox. Also, it may simply be done for the learning experience of setting up minimal systems on low end hardware.
If you want to use something that works more or less out of the box you should try antiX or Vector Light, if you want to do it yourself I would recommend to make a minimal install of Debian or Slackware and build your system up with lightweight software until it fits your needs (and isn't to heavy for the hardware).
Distros that I personally would not recommend to use on low-RAM hardware are Slitaz, Tinycore and Puppy.
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 06:26 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667
|
ps there are some good project ideas on this site: http://kmandla.wordpress.com
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 12:12 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,268
|
I haven't tries the latest AntiX yet (it's sitting in the drive waiting) but the last one ran the Ted word processor or the Dillo web-browser in under 60MB. Tiny Core and Damn Small need quite a bit of configuring to get a usable system, but AntiX is ready to use.
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 01:58 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512
Rep: 
|
You could get a basic Slackware system on such a machine. You'd nee a very light window manager if you wanted to try a GUI and it would likely do a lot of disk swapping due to the limited memory.
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 04:51 PM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I was mistaken on the RAM 147 MB, so I'm going to give Slackware a try. The reason I'm asking is for this is I have owned this LT for 10 years and would hate to throw it on the trash heap (I mean recycle Heap). And mostly to learn more about Linux inerds....
Thanks for all the replies.
|
|
|
08-10-2012, 07:36 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
Thanks for replying.
Live cd's are a great way to test out distro's. If you don't get one working try some of the others.
Just as in this post. You see some folks like one thing and hate another. Try what you can get your hands on and see what you like best. You are very limited with that system. Only a small subset of linux with a gui can work on it.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 10:14 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Linux Mint XFCE
Posts: 654
Rep:
|
A live CD might not be the best bet since on such an old machine it will be slow as all getup. I'll echo the suggestions for SL or DSL. You might also want to try some of the lighter window managers.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 04:01 PM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
A live cd tests the distro's ability to run on their hardware. It is a simple gauge to know how much or little work they need to do to use it in a proper install.
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 03:39 AM
|
#13
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro
A live cd tests the distro's ability to run on their hardware. It is a simple gauge to know how much or little work they need to do to use it in a proper install.
|
True.
Just keep in mind that live-CDs have higher memory requirements. This can lead to situations were the live-CD doesn't work at all (not enough memory, no swap space available) or very slow (not enough memory, swap space used), although the same system installed to a harddisk works fine.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|