LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2016, 11:26 AM   #1
manashpal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2016
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
how to install flash player 10.0 or higher from adobe site for chromium browser ?


after installing flash from software centre, I can run " pixlr.com " website on my linux firerox , but not in chromium-browser.

on opening the site a message is coming up " you need to get the adobe flash player 10.0 or higher " .

I have downloaded the flash tar.gz file and copied libpepflashplayer.so file to the /usr/lib/chromium-browser/plugins.

but www.pixlr.com is facing to flash player problem on starting in chromium.

any help ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot at 2016-11-26 21:51:50.png
Views:	29
Size:	154.8 KB
ID:	23627   Click image for larger version

Name:	firefox pixlr.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	114.8 KB
ID:	23628  
 
Old 11-26-2016, 11:31 AM   #2
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,279
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503Reputation: 3503
Try

Code:
locate libflashplayer.so
Re-Name the original libflashplayer.so to libflashplayer.so.old

Copy the new one you downloaded into the location shown you. To help you know exactly even more on where to place the new one. Type in your browser search bar.

Code:
about:plugins
https://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player...-chromium.html

Edit: But if you screwed it up already. None of my advice will help you.

Last edited by rokytnji; 11-26-2016 at 11:32 AM.
 
Old 11-26-2016, 09:04 PM   #3
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by manashpal View Post
any help ?
Hi...

It sounds like you missed a step or two. I would delete what you put into "/usr/lib/chromium-browser/plugins" and start over again (but don't delete the folder.) I've had to install a standalone copy of Pepperflash for Chromium in the past myself, here's how you do it...

1. Go here and choose the correct architecture for your operating system, assuming your browser is the same architecture as the the OS. Choose the "FP 23 PPAPI" version and save it to a convenient location.

2. When the download is completed, extract both the "libpepflashplayer.so" and the "manifest.json" files to "/usr/lib/chromium-browser/plugins." Or if you choose to extract the entire contents to a folder in the same directory where you downloaded the file to, just move the two files to the plugins folder. You will most likely need root privileges to do this. If you're running Ubuntu or one of it's derivatives, you can need open a root window by using the "gksudo" command plus whatever your file manager is. As an example, if you're using Lubuntu, the command would be...

Code:
gksudo pcmanfm
Stay in the plugins folder for the next step...

3. Open the "manifest.json" file using a text editor (you can probably just double click on it) and find the version of flash player. It will most likely say: "version": "23.0.0.207" Don't change anything but remember the number you see or write it down. Close all windows.

4. Open another terminal window and run this command...

Code:
sudo gedit /etc/chromium-browser/default
If you don't have "gedit" you can either install it or replace it with a text editor of your choice. Where it says "CHROMIUM_FLAGS," copy and paste the command below to where it looks exactly like it does below, except the version number, if it's different...

Code:
CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/chromium-browser/plugins/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=23.0.0.207"
Be sure to save the changes and close the window.

5. Open Chromium and run...

Code:
about:plugins
as rokytnji mentioned. You should see Flash Player listed. If not, you may have missed something. Go back and check to make sure you did everything correctly.

6. If you do see Flash Player listed, your website should run correctly now. Let us know how it works or if you need additional help.

Disclaimer: Be careful with commands that are prefaced with "su" or "sudo." They will essentially allow root access to your system. Mistakes could possibly damage or even destroy your OS.

Some of the information I've given above is from Craig Gomez here.

Regards...

Last edited by ardvark71; 11-27-2016 at 12:34 AM. Reason: Added information and link/Other changes.
 
Old 11-27-2016, 02:03 PM   #4
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243
I just download the latest google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb. then used ARK or File-Roller to extract it. then go to the data.tar.xz file. Extract that, then go like this. Look for the opt directory, then move that entire file structor into /opt - the opt directory in your home directory. This automatically setups up the one of the default search paths for pepperflash into your /opt directory. I know that this works for FireFox. install a flash wrapper too from your repo.

Code:
/google/chrome/PepperFlash
or I go to the abobie webpage when I see it telling me my flash is outdated. then download that in tar format then un-tar it and put it into my .mozzia/plugins folder in my home directory. that too works for me.
 
Old 11-27-2016, 04:39 PM   #5
crazy-yiuf
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 51
apt-get install pepperflash-nonfree has always worked for me. Am I missing something?
 
Old 11-27-2016, 04:57 PM   #6
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243Reputation: 2243
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy-yiuf View Post
apt-get install pepperflash-nonfree has always worked for me. Am I missing something?
I do not think so. your repo just has pepperflash-nonfree in it. Mine does not. at least I don't think it does.

plus I do not add my nonefree repo address into my addresses.

Last edited by BW-userx; 11-27-2016 at 04:58 PM.
 
Old 11-27-2016, 05:15 PM   #7
crazy-yiuf
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 51
Yeah, I assumed the original poster was using Ubuntu from the icon. I probably shouldn't do that.

Still, if that package is an option it is probably the best one, in my opinion.
 
Old 11-27-2016, 06:23 PM   #8
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy-yiuf View Post
Still, if that package is an option it is probably the best one, in my opinion.
Hi...

The problem is that, from looking through Adobe's EULA, I don't think the pepperflash-nonfree package falls within Adobe's requirements or stipulations, hence my solution.

Regards...
 
Old 11-28-2016, 12:29 AM   #9
crazy-yiuf
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
The problem is that, from looking through Adobe's EULA, I don't think the pepperflash-nonfree package falls within Adobe's requirements or stipulations, hence my solution.
I am unable to find any evidence of this. Debian has provided the package for quite a while now, and is generally responsible about such things.

The package is a script which downloads the proprietary version of Chrome from Google and transplants flash into chromium. It's been a while since I first installed it, but I suspect it made me agree to the EULA when I did.

However, IANAL, and from what I can make of the "sublicensee" restrictions, you're violating the EULA if you sneeze.
 
Old 11-28-2016, 01:05 AM   #10
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy-yiuf View Post
I am unable to find any evidence of this. Debian has provided the package for quite a while now, and is generally responsible about such things.
You may be right. I was going on what it looked like it said to me and decided to err on the side on caution and safety.

Probably my main issue and why I don't think that the nonfree plugin is legal is under the same section you mentioned below (for those interested in some background information and the EULA, please see here and here)...

Quote:
3. EULA and Distribution Terms.

(a) Sublicensee shall ensure that the Adobe Software is distributed to end users under an enforceable end user license agreement, in favor of Sublicensee and its suppliers containing at least each of the following minimum terms (the “End-User License”): (i) a prohibition against distribution and copying, (ii) a prohibition against modifications and derivative works, (iii) a prohibition against decompiling, reverse engineering, disassembling, and otherwise reducing the Adobe Software to a human-perceivable form, (iv) a provision indicating ownership of Sublicensee Product (as defined in Section 8) by Sublicensee and its licensors, (v) a disclaimer of indirect, special, incidental, punitive, and consequential damages, and (vi) other industry standard disclaimers and limitations, including, as applicable: a disclaimer of all applicable statutory warranties, to the full extent allowed by law.

(b) Sublicensee shall ensure that the Adobe Software is distributed to Sublicensee’s distributors under an enforceable distribution license agreement, in favor of Sublicensee and its suppliers containing terms as protective of Adobe as the Adobe Terms.
Honestly, unless I'm misunderstanding something, there is no way that the distributions that have a copy of the nonfree package in their repositories are (or even can) follow all of these requirements, unless this is referring to just Google. Either way, I don't know how Google or the various Linux distributions can get around the clause that forbids "distribution and copying."

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy-yiuf View Post
However, IANAL, and from what I can make of the "sublicensee" restrictions, you're violating the EULA if you sneeze.
That was my impression, too. Very restrictive.

Not that I have anything against Adobe or Flash Player but for this reason, I would like to see Lightspark become a viable and equal alternative to Flash Player.

Regards...

Last edited by ardvark71; 11-29-2016 at 04:08 AM. Reason: Added wordage and comment.
 
Old 11-28-2016, 10:02 PM   #11
c0wb0y
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Inside the oven
Distribution: Windows
Posts: 421

Rep: Reputation: 74
Chromium has a builtin flash player called pepper-flash. Check if that is installed. It doesn't use the locally installed Flash Player. Firefox uses that, though.
 
Old 11-29-2016, 03:50 AM   #12
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by c0wb0y View Post
Chromium has a builtin flash player called pepper-flash.
Hi...

You're referring to Chrome, right? Chromium doesn't have Pepperflash installed by default, at least the copies available in the Ubuntu repositories, perhaps other distributions.

Regards...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] installation adobe flash player in web browser of google chromium not ramia Linux Mint 5 12-03-2015 03:26 PM
Need newest flash player for Mint Chromium browser jfreeman Linux - Newbie 5 04-02-2015 10:31 AM
Grsecurity/PaX adobe flash crashes in Chromium Browser debwalker Linux - Security 2 07-07-2012 10:38 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration