LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2003, 07:06 PM   #1
KZxHugo79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
How do i make my linux look "cool"


How do i disable rezising and moving of the terminal screen and have it embedded to the background? like its always up and in the background as a part of the background. Not sure if i'm pharsing my question well. But any well would be appreciated, thanks
 
Old 01-11-2003, 07:07 PM   #2
KZxHugo79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Or any fancy tip for making gnome look alittle better would be appreciated as well. BTW using redhat 8.0
 
Old 01-11-2003, 07:09 PM   #3
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
Try using something like eterm or aterm as your terminal, they have things like transparency built into them.

Another option is if you only want info, and not the ability to type into this terminal, look into root-tail instead, over at www.freshmeat.net

Cool
 
Old 01-12-2003, 09:50 AM   #4
MiscGeek
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Georgia, US
Distribution: RHEL WS4
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 30
The gnome-terminal also supports transparency. Although it's not quite as good as eterm and friends.

To enable transparency in gnome-terminal:

1. Open a terminal.
2. Click the edit -> current profile menu.
3. Click the Effects tab.
4. Choose Transparent background and adjust the shade transparent or image background until it suits you.

Mike
 
Old 01-12-2003, 10:08 AM   #5
snocked
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 482

Rep: Reputation: 30
The only problem I have with transparent terminals is that I can't see one of the file colors very well against most backgrounds. Grey, white, and black are exceptions.
 
Old 01-12-2003, 10:14 AM   #6
MiscGeek
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Georgia, US
Distribution: RHEL WS4
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 30
I would have to agree. I played with transparency for a while and thought it was cool But, you had to have the right background to be able to see everything. I finally gave up and went back to a plain old terminal.

Mike
 
Old 01-12-2003, 11:40 AM   #7
charlie123
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: S.E. England
Distribution: Redhat 8.0
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
is it not possible to change the colours assigned to the different file types? At the moment i cant see the blue ones very well . transparency is very cool though .
 
Old 01-12-2003, 11:54 AM   #8
macewan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,055
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 45
root-tail?

usage:
root-tail -g 80x25+100+50 /var/log/messages
 
Old 01-12-2003, 12:07 PM   #9
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
Quote:
Originally posted by charlie123
is it not possible to change the colours assigned to the different file types? At the moment i cant see the blue ones very well . transparency is very cool though .
You can, in every window manager. Which one do you use?
 
Old 01-12-2003, 12:16 PM   #10
charlie123
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: S.E. England
Distribution: Redhat 8.0
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
its ok i found /etc/DIR_COLORS and in there you can assign what colours you want displayed in the terminal to represent files, directories etc. thanks anyway.
 
Old 01-13-2003, 02:01 AM   #11
salparadise
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Birmingham UK
Distribution: Various
Posts: 1,736

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
blackbox

coolest looking desktop bar none
 
Old 01-13-2003, 06:53 AM   #12
macewan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,055
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 45
blackbox
http://www.deadmule.com/images/tmp/screenshotblah.jpg

openbox
http://www.deadmule.com/images/tmp/OpenBox.png

i prefer openbox, as does my wife, because of the anti alias fonts option.
 
Old 01-13-2003, 08:55 AM   #13
jMack
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: GreatLakesState
Distribution: RH 8.0, Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
All I have to say is WOW.

But how do I use, say Blackbox?

newbie me
 
Old 01-13-2003, 01:30 PM   #14
charlie123
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: S.E. England
Distribution: Redhat 8.0
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
You can, in every window manager. Which one do you use?
thanks for reply
(i am referring to the colours/colors displayed in the terminal)
ok i edited /etc/DIR_COLORS according to the instructions in the file, but it did not work.
i am using redhat 8.0, KDE 3, and i use konsole as my terminal. when i do ls the different file types (executable, links, directories etc etc) all print in different colours/colors but some are inconvieniant cos i like to use transparency. i was hoping to change executables to bold red, and directories to black with white background.

does anyone know how i can do this? or at least point me in the direction of the correct config file.

thanks
 
Old 01-13-2003, 03:48 PM   #15
NSKL
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Rome, Italy ; Novi Sad, Srbija; Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu / ITOS2008
Posts: 1,207

Rep: Reputation: 47
You can also use root-tail (already mentioned by MasterC) or colortail which is the color coded cousin of root-tail, although many prefer root-tail over colortail.
For colors, isn't it /etc/DIR_COLORS? Or perhaps /etc/profile, or some script in /etc/profile.d? Or maybe ~/.bashrc, or ~/.bash_profile.
I also think this is dependent on what distro you use, all of them like to mess with bash in different ways, so i suggest you try to find some distro related docs on this issue, or just grep the hell out of all the files that control bash.
Good luck
-NSKL
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So many errors when I typed the "make" and "make install" command Niceman2005 Linux - Software 23 07-22-2009 02:33 PM
problem "make"ing gtk+ "/usr/bin/env: perl -w" caid Linux - Newbie 8 07-29-2005 04:51 AM
enabling "cool 'n' quiet" on linux guy24x Linux - Hardware 2 03-24-2005 05:49 PM
LFS 4.1: Stalled at Perl, "missing seperator" error from "make" SparceMatrix Linux From Scratch 1 06-07-2003 03:31 PM
i just finished typing "./configure" and "make" in mplayer directory... kublador Linux - General 4 02-22-2003 03:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration