Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-15-2007, 08:06 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Distribution: Mandriva, Fedora
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
Hard disk partitioning
 I'm not a nebie to Linux, as i have it installed on other machines.
This question is about partitioning a 80gb hard disk,
The 80gb is the total size of what i have to work with on this box and would like a duel boot system Linux & WindowsXP. The Linux is used everyday for internet/music/photo, the windows partition will be used for a few minutes once a month to update a satnav appliance (TomTom).
So the question is what percent of the disk should go to each desktop, how would you divide the 80gb?
thanks for time
Last edited by strunal; 11-15-2007 at 08:31 AM.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 08:13 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288
Rep:
|
If you think you might use Windows for stuff besides updating your TomTom then add a G for each additional use up to 10G, if not, 3G, the rest Linux.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 08:16 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: N'rn WI -- USA
Distribution: Kubuntu 8.04, ClarkConnect 4
Posts: 1,142
Rep:
|
Rather than dual booting, I would run Windows in a virtual machine. The only thing I would have to study would be whether the VM has access to the serial/USB port the TomTom uses.
Running it in a VM would mean you wouldn't have to set aside a partition for Windows, you wouldn't have to reboot the computer when you wanted to run Windows, and you could make a backup of Windows anytime you wanted by copying the couple VM files.
Otherwise, if you wanted/had to dual boot, and you didn't plan on doing anything else in Windows, 8GB should be more than enough hard-drive space.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 08:33 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809
|
8-10GB Windows
8-10GB Linux
~30GB shared data
balance empty (unpartitioned)--for future changes
I now use ext3 for shared data---I access from Windows using the ext2fsd driver. (But then I hardly ever boot into Windows)
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 08:37 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Distribution: Mandriva, Fedora
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thanks all for the quick replies, and keep them coming.
10gb max for windows then, If it was'nt for the satnav update i would'nt have windows at all, i settled on a duel boot as im not keen on the other options.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04; Debian Etch
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
I would also check out wine when you have your linux system setup. I recently went back to trying wine after a while and installing some of my old games were as simple as the windows install and after some through testing I haven't found a problem in performance. This would give you 10GB back but more importantly starting your program under linux is as easy as starting it under windows.
check it out
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 09:18 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288
Rep:
|
I'd have to agree w/ Slick666. I have a dual boot system as a backup for things that just won't work with wine or VMWare. I have VMWare for things that won't work for wine, and I have wine. I rarely have to boot my VM or reboot to Windows, and typically when I do the things that weren't working in wine aren't working in the other two either.
HTH
Forrest
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|