Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
People dont write as much malicious programs for linux as they do for windows.
So the only use of these programs (like f-prot, antivir..) is in an email server so that they can scan incoming and outgoing emails and atachments.
Distribution: Just about anything... so long as it is Debain based.
Posts: 297
Rep:
To clarify why Linux does not get virused as much:
It's not that there aren't malicious code writers out there for Linux; it's that Linux handles permissions and security much better than Windows. If you look as how MS works, there's this nebulous thing called a registry. When a viral code is executed in MS, the registry is written to and executable files are also "virused" so that each time they are executed they reinfect the system.
This is most often possible because the local users are given local administrative rights. Do they need those rights? Probably not, but that's what MS gives them by default.
MS will also allow executable files to be written to. Think about it.... why would that need to ever happen? Why would an ececutable file need to be written to by anyone? It's and executable... it just needs to be executed.
In Linux, applications are executed by the service or user that runs the program. If the program is viral, it is only able to do damage to whatever that user has rights to. By default, only root can write to an executable file. As long as you're not spawning processes as root, you're pretty safe from a virus.
The viruses that I do know of that affect Linux boxes actually are not Linux flaws at all... they're flaws in applications that run on many Linux boxes.
I guess to sum it all up, it's difficult now days to write a poor operating system, but the people in Redmond do a pretty good job of it. With Linux, keep your applications patched and you'll be fine without any virus scanning software.
Can virus detectors running on linux detect Windows viruses?
Could be several uses for this, as the Linux OS could perform as sandbox. Handy on dual boot machines.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.