Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
07-22-2003, 04:26 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: England, Derbyshire
Distribution: Dual boot XP pro & MDK 10 official, KDE.
Posts: 69
Rep:
|
Getting worried Need HELP... GCC3.3
I downloaded the GCC3.3 files and in a terminal I di the following
It's half an hour later and still going. Do I need to do a make install next?
Have I totally buggered up my system now?
Can I delete the millions of files it's creating?
Help cos I'm getting worried I'll have no HD space left or ruin my setup
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 05:06 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
GCC buil takes much space...Yes, you need make instal next. Then you can delete the whole source directory, in fact.If you feel you need the source, use 'make clean' after 'make install'. It will delate all compiled files (leaving source).
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 05:07 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 21, RHEL 5,6&7, Windoze 7
Posts: 235
Rep:
|
Hi Mike,
Press CTRL+c to stop the compile. then type "df" to see how much disk
space is left. If you want to finish the compile type "make" again then
"make install".
Michael
Last edited by youngstorm; 07-22-2003 at 05:09 PM.
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 06:03 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: England, Derbyshire
Distribution: Dual boot XP pro & MDK 10 official, KDE.
Posts: 69
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the replies, It took over an hour and finally ended because of 'memory exhausted'
I deleted the source folder to frre up the diskspace again and will try again tomorrow.
Is there a way to compile and save some memory? I don't really understand what's going on.
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 06:05 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Used to use Mandrake/Mandriva
Posts: 2,794
Rep:
|
If you dunno what it's doing, do you really need GCC3.3?
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 06:44 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: England, Derbyshire
Distribution: Dual boot XP pro & MDK 10 official, KDE.
Posts: 69
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well I used DJGPP c compiler in win xp and I'd like to carry on with a good c compiler. I read that GCC is very good. So if it's there I'll use it.
This way of installing app's is VERY foriegn to me.
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 07:16 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Used to use Mandrake/Mandriva
Posts: 2,794
Rep:
|
Mandrake 9.1 already has 3.2.2 so I was wondering why you wanted to risk breaking your entire install to upgrade to 3.3. I just wondered if you knew a specific reason why you needed to go beyond 3.2.2.
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 07:19 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Actually Proud in his similar other post I was suggesting the same thing. There is no need to compile a compiler when one is readily available:
urpmi gcc
As root of course. When prompted for discs, feed em until it's content. Don't mind the roar, it's natural.
Cool
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 07:40 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: England, Derbyshire
Distribution: Dual boot XP pro & MDK 10 official, KDE.
Posts: 69
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks
|
|
|
07-22-2003, 07:43 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
You're welcome Did it work, or rather, is it working?
Cool
|
|
|
07-25-2003, 08:27 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: England, Derbyshire
Distribution: Dual boot XP pro & MDK 10 official, KDE.
Posts: 69
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I managed to get the gcc & binutils rpms from linux cd 1 to install.
All is ok now.
Thanks for your help
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|