Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
....you can add a another user which have root access.
That strikes me as the hard way---why not just us "su" to switch to the root account?
To the OP:
If you set up the machine, then you provided a "root" password as part of the process. If someone else set it up, then they can give you the password.
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Debian, Oracle Solaris 10
Posts: 1,420
Rep:
Quote:
That strikes me as the hard way---why not just us "su" to switch to the root account?
But if a user login using "su" he/she would not be able to run some of the commands, for an example "ifconfig" and he/she will get the following error -
bash: ifconfig: command not found
su gives the particular user root permission but does not change the PATH variable and current working directory. So, the user will not be able to execute command in /usr/sbin/ directory.
su - changes the root permission, PATH variable and current working directory which allows a non-root user to execute all commands.
But if a user login using "su" he/she would not be able to run some of the commands, for an example "ifconfig" and he/she will get the following error -
bash: ifconfig: command not found
su gives the particular user root permission but does not change the PATH variable and current working directory. So, the user will not be able to execute command in /usr/sbin/ directory.
su - changes the root permission, PATH variable and current working directory which allows a non-root user to execute all commands.
I don't think so...
If I am not mistaken, "su" means switch to root---with all privileges. The only difference whne using "su -" is that it puts you into root's home directory.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.