Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
01-05-2016, 04:31 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,912
|
I used to work almost exclusively on mainframe UNIX servers... downtime was NOT allowed - except at a specified monthly preventative maintenance period. And those periods could be removed at the drop of a hat. Desktop systems were treated pretty much the same - they would get even less maintenance - and still had to be up and running for months at a time. UNIX could do that, Linux as well...
tmpfs has its uses - the first use (though it wasn't called tmpfs) was for file locking. Using ram for a small filesystem was MUCH faster for handling and recovering locks. A system reboot always restored the locks to a known state.
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 11:45 AM
|
#17
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
My fix for /tmp not mounting
Not sure why this is the case, but 'systemctl unmask tmp.mount' - which left tmp.mount disabled - allowed my fstab entry to work. This is on CentOS 7. (I, too, and working on a mostly CIS-compliant install).
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 01:51 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,912
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by parsley42
Not sure why this is the case, but 'systemctl unmask tmp.mount' - which left tmp.mount disabled - allowed my fstab entry to work. This is on CentOS 7. (I, too, and working on a mostly CIS-compliant install).
|
The only thing I can think of is that systemd was using some stored state and not regenerating it when the fstab entry was added. Mask/reboot/unmask may have forced it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|