Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
12-01-2007, 01:40 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2007
Posts: 121
Rep:
|
Format For Linux
Hello.
I was just wondering what would be the most appropriate format for a Linux partition. One of my friends originally put Linux on my computer and he used ext3. However, I know that he didn't know much about Linux at the time and I still don't. I've seen many thing suggesting ext2. I'm trying out somethings right now and in particular I would like a recommendation for the partition format that should be used for Kubuntu, Slackware, and JAD. Just letting me know which format would be great, but if you want to throw in why it'd be the appropriate choice as well, that would be awesome. Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 01:51 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian stable
Posts: 5,908
|
Ext2 is the older format (not journaled). Ext3 is newer (journaled). It keeps a journal of the state of the filesystem so that if power is interrupted, on reboot, the system can recover the journal (and the state of the filesystem) and easily repair any data corruption that may have occured as a result of the loss of power.
Other journaled filesystems are ReiserFS, JFS, and XFS.
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 02:30 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
You should be alright using either ext3 or reiserfs. People have different preferences, but you should be fine using one or both of the filesystems I mentioned. I would personally avoid ext2 because it lacks any journalling capabilities, so if you had a power cut or the system did not shutdown cleanly you could have problems.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|