LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Newbie (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)
-   -   Flash or substitute for iceweasel in Debian 8 MATE (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/flash-or-substitute-for-iceweasel-in-debian-8-mate-4175560197/)

supusr 11-30-2015 12:26 AM

Flash or substitute for iceweasel in Debian 8 MATE
 
Recently installed Debian 8.2 MATE. All updated and configured with my preferred apps, and all working except the ability to view video on some sites that require flash (such as http://www.oregonlive.com/#/0). Software sources are all jesse/stable. Any clear, step-by-step guidance that works or reference to same? Thanks, in advance.

berndbausch 11-30-2015 12:50 AM

Does this work for Debian 8?
https://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer/

supusr 11-30-2015 12:55 AM

Well, yes (I imagine). I neglected to say that I prefer not to use non-free or contrib sources. Sorry. I may have to use Chromium, but I would like to stay with iceweasel.

273 11-30-2015 12:58 AM

If you use Chromium you won't get Pepperflash without the contrib repository either.

supusr 11-30-2015 03:44 PM

Yes. Thanks.

Fred Caro 11-30-2015 07:53 PM

Not sure if the 'contrib' repo is free either.

Fred.

273 12-01-2015 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred Caro (Post 5457662)
Not sure if the 'contrib' repo is free either.

Fred.

Well, Flash itself isn't and I don't think Pepperflash is either so that makes at least two packages in there which are not free.

Timothy Miller 12-01-2015 06:25 AM

Yup, no nonfree sources = no flash, plain and simple.

If you do enable non-free for flash, I suggest using freshplugin instead of flash, it's a wrapper that allows the pepperflash plugin to work with Firefox/Iceweasel. In my experience, it's to the point that it works better than native flash on Debian.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.