Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
12-14-2002, 01:54 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Fat32 supported with RedHat 8.0 ?
Alright, completely new to linux, spent last few hours after installing trying to figure out how to gain access to my fat partitions. ( if this is already answered apologies...it is way past bedtime and I don't have it me for another search lol ) I think I figured out the basics with the mount command and the fstab file. When booting up though I get the message fs fat32 not supported by kernel. I am supposing that the error means exactly what it says...if not lemee know. If I am indeed correct is their a module I can download or install to gain access to aformentioned fat32 partition ?
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 05:12 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: 406292E 290755N
Distribution: GNU/Linux Slackware 8.1, Redhat 8.0, LFS 4.0
Posts: 1,004
Rep:
|
Welcome to LQ.org, WestNile!
FAT32 is certainly supported by Redhat 8.0. There's something you didn't pick during installation that's all. Can I suggest that at this stage, you consider re-installing (if it's a fresh install you just did) and you check the option "DOS partition tools" (or something like that). This will build support for FAT32 into the kernel.
The alternative is to rebuild your kernel although this is really recommended for the advanced user. If you'd like to try rebuilding the kernel, then doa search for "kernel" on this forum and you'll find lots of threads on it.
At this stage, reinstalling needs to be considered if you've only just installed the system.
Let us know which you want to do.
Bert
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 08:53 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Gentoo, Fedora Core
Posts: 408
Rep:
|
If you have enough space I would just reinstall it, and install everything. That way you have everything you could possibly need off the CD. The command for mounting a fat filesystem under Linux is "mount -t vfat /dev/hd?? /mnt/whereyoumountit
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 03:38 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Mosquitoville
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,306
Rep:
|
yea, its vfat, not fat32
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 08:07 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ohhhh rebuilding kernel ?
Actually.....rebuilding the kernel kinda sounds like fun lol 
I have 3 working Win2k machines and a Mac in addition to this one which is dual booted so it is not like I will be without a machine or backups if I blow it up. Part of the reason I loaded Linux was to learn how to use it to the full extent. If I wanted something canned I would just use Windows again
Now when I downloaded the .iso's I only got the first 3 disks and not the last two. Will I need to get those to rebuild the kernel ? Looks like I have got some research ahead of me...
Quote:
Originally posted by Bert
Welcome to LQ.org, WestNile!
FAT32 is certainly supported by Redhat 8.0. There's something you didn't pick during installation that's all. Can I suggest that at this stage, you consider re-installing (if it's a fresh install you just did) and you check the option "DOS partition tools" (or something like that). This will build support for FAT32 into the kernel.
The alternative is to rebuild your kernel although this is really recommended for the advanced user. If you'd like to try rebuilding the kernel, then doa search for "kernel" on this forum and you'll find lots of threads on it.
At this stage, reinstalling needs to be considered if you've only just installed the system.
Let us know which you want to do.
Bert
|
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 08:44 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Mosquitoville
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,306
Rep:
|
i don't think you got it. linux calls fat32 vfat
if i type mount -t fat32 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1, it
tells me fat32 not supported by the kernel too.
you just got the wrong name.
|
|
|
12-15-2002, 04:49 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: 406292E 290755N
Distribution: GNU/Linux Slackware 8.1, Redhat 8.0, LFS 4.0
Posts: 1,004
Rep:
|
Redhat does usually detect other FAT partitions on the disk and build support for them in. As others point out, it does call FAT32 'vfat' so you would mount your FAT32 partition using that label.
Rebuilding the kernel is more fraught than fun - there's a lot that can go not quite right, and it often takes a few tries. It's best to wait until you absolutely have to do it - for example when you have to enable a new protocol in your kernel. There's lots of time for you to learn how to do that too - no need to hurry!
I'd strongly recommend trying to mount the partition first, because everyone here strongly suspects you might already have FAT32 support already.
Bert
|
|
|
02-11-2003, 03:54 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
FAT32 & Large HDs
I attempted an install of RH 5.1 on a Maxtor 40GB drive. When I got to the selection for Disk Druid or FDISK, I first selected Disk Druid. Hda was recognized as FAT16. HDB had nonsense characters in that field. Info from the summary line:
Total = 8032M, Used = 39205M, Free = -31173M.
Apparently, 5.1 has a problem with FAT32 and any HD space above 8.032GB. I backed up and selected FDISK, which had a similar problem. At this point I aborted the install without doing any partitioning, to avoid the possibility of HD damage.
I expect to receive my 8.0 disks this week. I have high hopes that it will install with no HD problems and that it will install without the previous xfree86 and mouse recognition problems of 5.1 I experienced on a 486DX66 Vesa system.
|
|
|
02-11-2003, 03:59 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
CybersaurusREXX, RH 5.1 is very, very old. It was released when 40GB disks were really rare. 8.0 will handle it much better.
|
|
|
02-11-2003, 04:07 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
Thanks, I have high confidence that it will.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|