Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc
Hi there,
I get a lot of error messages "Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc". I am running Debian 7 64 fully patched. I already googled this error message and could not solve it. Playing around with ulimit does nothing.
Anyone any good idea how to get rid of this error? Thanks for reading
You can't have done much Googling, because if you had searched for exact-phrases you would find that this message is coming from tor.
There is always a limit as to the maximum number of connections that any server (process) can accept, and therefore sustain, at any one time. More connection-requests might come, such that a select() loop would see them, but the process can only open so-many sockets at one time.
If you are now entertaining over four thousand sockets, you already have a serious problem, and that is the root-cause problem, not any sort of limit-tweaking command that you might use to increase the limits that prevail.
You can't have done much Googling, because if you had searched for exact-phrases you would find that this message is coming from tor.
As I said: I googled it and the fix with ulimit does not help on this server. Read it again. Understand it.
There is always a limit as to the maximum number of connections that any server (process) can accept, and therefore sustain, at any one time. More connection-requests might come, such that a select() loop would see them, but the process can only open so-many sockets at one time.
UHHHH, yeah?
If you are now entertaining over four thousand sockets, you already have a serious problem, and that is the root-cause problem, not any sort of limit-tweaking command that you might use to increase the limits that prevail.
Right, thank you for not helping but bulls****ing me.
Distribution: Void, Linux From Scratch, Slackware64
Posts: 3,150
Rep:
sundialsvcs is correct a simple google search for that error ( i copied and pasted it as you posted it ) givez a load of links all pointing to the problem being with tor.
There is always a limit as to the maximum number of connections that any server (process) can accept, and therefore sustain, at any one time.
aaah, it's a server!
another piece of crucial information withheld.
niftyhamster, the reactions you received are entirely justified.
you however, slowly drifting into abusive language and still not providing the minimum effort required to enable others to help you, aren't justified.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.