Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-18-2005, 09:05 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 42
Rep:
|
Easier, upgrade or reinstall?
Hello.... I've got some hardware issues I'm trying to get by and I'd like some input on which direction to go in.
I installed the stable Debian 3.0 with the 2.2.20 idepci kernel on my AMD athlon machine. Pretty good, but had to use the VESA driver for my vid card, and no support for my audigy soundcard.
I tried with no success to upgrade to the 2.6 kernel and the 2.4 kernel using instructions from several different sources. Not sure where I went wrong. Should I keep trying to do that?
Or should I download the sarge Debian with the 2.6 kernel and install that from scratch? Theres nothing important on my hard drive and wouldn't mind reformatting at all.
Which would be easier from a newbie perspective?
Thanks!!!
|
|
|
01-18-2005, 09:46 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the DC 'burbs
Distribution: Arch, Scientific Linux, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 4,290
|
I've had woody -> sarge upgrades go bad on me before (glibc wasn't upgraded properly, broke everything), but then again, it was in a very nonstandard environment (UML). My advice would be to give it a try but keep sarge install disks around in case things get b0rked beyond repair.
|
|
|
01-19-2005, 02:36 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Hilliard, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Kubuntu
Posts: 1,851
Rep:
|
This is probably a pretty good idea, you also might want to use a scratch .config so there are no old options conflicting with the new ones.
|
|
|
01-19-2005, 12:03 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Debian - Sarge -- Slackware 10.1 - Dropline
Posts: 154
Rep:
|
If you're going to upgrade regardless, try doing an upgrade through apt. This is a strong point of Debian, not having to reinstall to upgrade. I don't think (not 100% sure) the 2.6 kernel is available or compatible with woody.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|