Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
![Reply](https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/images/buttons/reply.gif) |
02-10-2005, 01:49 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
Dual hard drive, dual OS
I just bought a second hard drive and am looking to install [insert Linux distro here] in addition to my Windows XP. I was wondering what you thought about this setup ~ install Windows on drive 1 and put its swap file on drive 2, then install Linux on drive 2 and put *its* swap partition on drive 1. Seems to me like this should improve performance, since the system can access program files and the swap space simultaneously...right??
Any advice?
|
|
|
02-10-2005, 01:54 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Distribution: NetBSD-2, FreeBSD-5.4, OpenBSD-3.[67], RHEL[34], OSX 10.4.1
Posts: 1,197
Rep:
|
Probably not going to be that big a deal. Most computers now don't really have a need for swap. If you have >512MB in your system, you're not going to hit swap that often (if ever).
Your theory is sound though if you still want to do this, but make sure you don't put them on the same cable as you'll just be defeating the purpose.
|
|
|
02-10-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Clarksburg, MD
Distribution: Fedora 1, Slax Live CD, Suse Live CD, Knoppix, Peanut
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
whoops.. sorry, deleted my first part.. I see what you're saying now...
I'm not a deep hardware expert, but I don't think that in terms of speed, it's going to matter whether you have the swap on the same partition/HD or the other.... Unless you're a professional movie editor for ILM and use the machine for some extremely intensive work.... But for normal day to day use, I think that each system on its own drive should work fine...
I have a dual boot XP/Fedora1. XP is on my main drive, and FC1 is on my second drive. I guess I've never noticed (or used an application that intensive) a speed slowdown from having a swap space on the same drive as the program files...
But, what you're suggesting will probably not harm the machine. I think you're just talking about a time difference in nano-seconds - ...
Cheers! Good luck!
Last edited by wjessup; 02-10-2005 at 03:48 PM.
|
|
|
02-10-2005, 03:43 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 134
Rep:
|
He never said they would be accessed simultaneously.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|