Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
12-10-2007, 11:12 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Rep:
|
Dual Boot RHEL 5.1 and WinXP, won't load Windoze
I installed RHEL 5.1
Linux seems to be working fine. Steep learning curve for me.
I wanted to dual boot my WinXP install. I resized the drive, everything seemed to go correctly. Now when I try to boot into WinXP, I get:
root noverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
System has only one hard drive. I saw other references to remapping the drive order in GRUB, I tried that also, but no joy.
I can mount and view the NTFS partition.
Suggestions? I've been on the net all morning looking around and it seems that XP wants to be the first partition on the first drive (from what I can find, it is). Not sure what else to do from here.
grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg.
# root (hd0,1)
# kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda2
# initrd /boot/initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,1)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
#hiddenmenu
password --md5 $1$SsdSG$WusNhBWKEH6pwLKzZQ3AQ0
title IBM Open Client for Linux 2.10 (GM) Client (2.6.18-53.el5)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ exec-shield=0 selinux=0 rhgb quiet
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-53.el5.img
title IBM Client for e-business Windows XP v2.12
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
and ...
[root@ericcol /]# /sbin/fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 7649 61440561 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda2 7650 14462 54725422+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 14463 14593 1052257+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Eric Collins
|
|
|
12-10-2007, 03:09 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hello? Is this thing on?
|
|
|
12-10-2007, 03:43 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288
Rep:
|
I'm not really seeing anything wrong with your setup. You can try adding "makeactive" on the line after "rootnoverify" in your grub.conf, but I don't think it should be needed.
HTH
Forrest
|
|
|
12-11-2007, 02:35 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I fought the law, and the law won...
Murphy's Law, that is.
I tried the makeactive switch, no difference.
Also, I checked with another person with the same basic setup, much more linux experience than me, on almost identical equipment, his grub looked the same, and he couldn't find anything wrong either.
It looks like I just hit a bug that hosed me.
I have since given up. And am reloading WinXP. I might try running Linux in a VM.
Thanks for the help,
Eric Collins
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|