Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Many computer manufacturers are now adding DRM to the BIOS of the computers that they make. For now, you can opt out of the DRM option, but that won't always be so, nor can you always go out and purchased a nonDRM machine as the older models age.
This DRM disallows certain files to be played/executed. It identifies files as 'belonging' to certain machines. And so on. The powerful Entertainment Industry is all over this like wasps on soda pop, but it has me concerned, what will it do to operating systems out side of Windows/Mac like Linux? DRM also has a long history of doing nasty things to files that aren't media like that Sony rootkit mess.
Yeah, DRM has a pretty bad reputation..and despite of what they try, I don't think BIOS DRM becomes the tyrant; at some point people get frustrated, and -- bad for the sellers -- if they don't buy it, the manufacturers can't make it.
There's a long list of "copy-protection" methods that have been invented, and this far each and every one of them has proven useless; the only thing they've done is made the life of those harder who actually don't try to break the copy protections. And that has lead to a lot (most?) of them being rejected, because people don't like buying audio discs that don't play on their legal players. I assume the same goes with DRM, but maybe in a longer run because it's hyped and developed so much.
Personally I'd rather buy food than a DRM-forced BIOS with a crappy computer around it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.