LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-20-2008, 03:37 AM   #1
budword
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Switched to regualr Ubuntu, because I don't like KDE4, at all. Looks like vista on crack.....
Posts: 675

Rep: Reputation: 31
Distro for a box with 40MB of ram....with some kind of gui.....


Just want to set up an old win98 box/40MB of ram with a simple gui/WM for web browsing, email, printing, simple office tasks. I've played around with puppy and DSL, they both say they need 64MB of ram, the same with vector.

Anyone have any luck with any particular distro with such a small amount of ram ?

Thanks much...

David
 
Old 07-20-2008, 04:27 AM   #2
b0uncer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Slackware + WindowMaker, Fluxbox or XFCE. Not sure if XFCE runs/how smoothly it runs with 40MB of RAM, but it's the lightest of the ones that resemble Windows/Gnome/KDE desktop environments; the lighter ones are usually more..well, they just differ from the mainstream by their outlooks, as you'll notice. I personally like WindowMaker and Fluxbox, though there are a lot of good choices outside them too. Slackware's install CD set/DVD includes many choices, and if you're not short on disk space, you can install them all if you like; if you leave KDE out which you will with that amount of RAM, the rest shouldn't eat too much disk space, so install them all, test them and remove those you don't like.

I'd say almost any distro does, the thing that most consumes your RAM is X and the desktop environment/window manager you run on it. KDE and Gnome run a lot of background processes and consume a lot of RAM, so they're probably out of question. See (do a web search) a list of modern window managers, most of them are easily available for any distribution you pick up - and most of them consume fairly small amount of RAM overall, so they're good in that manner. And as long as you have gtk/qt libraries installed, you can run any program you like, as long as they don't depend on too many KDE/Gnome libraries (if they do, you'll need to install those, which usually ends up installing the whole suites...sadly) Anyway picking up a distribution isn't usually the problem, installing it in a way that it doesn't use the memory-hogging software is; replacing the default desktop with a lighter one, not running so many unneeded background processes, ...

All in all, Slackware stands out as a good one if you ask me. Not everybody likes it, so you are just going to have to try it out to see if it's for your or not.
 
Old 07-20-2008, 04:28 AM   #3
pinniped
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: planet earth
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,732

Rep: Reputation: 50
Did 'puppy' install at all? 'Xubuntu' might just work; it depends on how the installer is set up. Otherwise search distrowatch.com for small or 'lightweight' distros with windows (or with X).

I think the general recommended RAM for running Linux + X is 64M, but I did run with ICEWM on 48M a long time ago; that was already pushing things though and I didn't have to run many programs at once to get the disk-swapping happening.
 
Old 07-20-2008, 11:18 AM   #4
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 130Reputation: 130
I seem to remember a similar post where someone ended up installing Fluxbuntu but it was still very very slow. It may be worth a try, though.
 
Old 07-21-2008, 04:31 PM   #5
geek745
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Distribution: Slackware; Ubuntu; Slax
Posts: 172
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 34
have you looked on distrowatch.com? might be a *really* minimal distro that you can use whose profile you can find there.

The bigger the kernel (hardware support) and the more sophisticated the gui wrapper (kde, gnome, xfce, fluxbox, blackbox, windowmaker) and applications(web, email, office), the more memory you will consume. A heads up, other than a text-mode web browser, your system will become unusable swapping ram onto disk, not to mention other office productivity applications. And don't consider running both at the same time. Firefox frequently has a real memory footprint of around 100MB and anything other than a command-line text editor will take about the same, as well.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What distro is ideal for an ancient 486 box? (no GUI necessary.) BenMJ Linux - Desktop 13 05-04-2008 08:27 PM
file server OS for only 40mb ram + 133mhz CPU tommytomthms5 Linux - Newbie 4 10-22-2007 05:09 PM
Dell Latitude LM P166 40Mb Ram-will any distros with a GUI work? newtwolinux Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 09-29-2005 11:25 AM
Laptop Pentium 1, 100mhz, 40mb RAM, 1.2ghz HDD. Which distro? Eerath Linux - Distributions 2 03-09-2005 09:42 AM
How to enter swap partition when installing suse8.2 with only 40mb ram cirelj Linux - Newbie 8 02-27-2004 07:06 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration