Definition of single vs dual boot - need clarification
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I describe my machine as dual boot Linux - Windows even though Linux and Windows have their own separate hard drives, but obviously share the same BIOS-UEFI
Is this correct, or would my machine technically be considered 'Single boot' since each OS has their own hard drive?
if you got more then one Operating System on your computer then
one + zero = single boot
one + one = dual boot
one + one + one = tri boot
one + one + one + one = quad boot
It doesn't matter if you have installed separate OS in separate disk with separate boot loader or multiple OSs with single boot-loader, you'll have only one active instance running at any given time.
The concept of single-boot and dual-boot which you read a lot in manuals or websites are actually referring to single boot-loader with one or multiple OSs attached to it (usually in separate partitions).
In your case, as you have different OS in separate disk with separate boot-loaders, you have Single-Boot Configuration.
Last edited by Madhu Desai; 12-10-2016 at 09:52 AM.
My opinion would be the number of bootable OS's on the system from cold boot, not to include choices like pxe/gpxe/ipxe, iscsi/nfs or other networked drives or vm's. May be that one might include usb, sd,cf and other normally removable media.
Distribution: Debian testing/sid; OpenSuSE; Fedora; Mint
Posts: 5,521
Rep:
I consider dual boot to be more than one operating system to choose from at boot time. Your bios may have a boot manager (F12 for boot menu, or something similar). That should allow you to choose legacy or bios boot options, so you don't need to go into bios setup to change it.
You're correct that part of the purpose of UEFI is to prevent an operating system from being booted "incorrectly," and/or to prevent booting some other system. (Imagine the "bored midnight operator" who is actually a professional industrial spy or saboteur, with a USB-stick in his pocket, waiting for 3:00 AM.)
(Imagine the "bored midnight operator" who is actually a professional industrial spy or saboteur, with a USB-stick in his pocket, waiting for 3:00 AM.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
good play on words.
