Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Ubuntu is a Very nice distro, powerful yest easy to set up, and the ubuntu website has great documentation on how to set up about everything if you run into problems. The only problem I have with Ubuntu is it doesn't detect the on board sound chip, but I guess it has something to do with the fact that it is Nforce2 ultra. I have not used mandrake as I couldn't get it to install. Xandros, I used very little of, but EVERYTHING worked right after installation, sound, video. I really like ubuntu, but that is prolly because that is where 90% of my linux experience lies. I'm n00b to linux as well, 1 week without M$. FC3 is also a pretty good distro, have used that some too. Same problem for me with sound. Xandros, Ubuntu, and FC3 all have very easy installation steps. Xandros to me would be a good starting place if you want windows like familiarity. Hope that helps.
Well I will be installing it onto an old Compaq Deskpro SFF P3 600MHz PC with 256Mb memory & have only been using it as a bittorrent client on my house network.
The missus uses my main system atm so until I get a new job & can build a new AMD 64 unit I will have to settle to play about with Linux on the Compaq & leave M$ XP Pro on the other.
Being pretty much a newbie myself, I use Santa Fe. It's a Debian based distribution that is specifically tailored to make sense and be easy to use for people that have used to Windows all thier lives.
I just installed Mandrake 10.1 a couple weeks ago. I was considering the same distros you were, including Ubuntu. I put in a good week of research on the following topics:
Supported Hardware. Print out your hardware spec (Windows Device Manager) and compare it to the supported hardware listed on most distro websites. Most sites provide this info although you may have to search for it.
Philosophy. The philosophy drives the development, the support, and the user community. It's worthy of consideration.
Integrated Tools. Primarily thinking about how easy it is to get and install apps and updates, but also tools for managing and navigating the system.
Problem Resolution. I trolled these boards for a bit (not since '03 tho!) looking at the different user problems, the types of responses given, and how long it took to resolve issues. Most people wear their favorite distros proudly and I also felt it was worthwhile to see what all these good folks were like, how they responded, etc.
Another decent source of info is DistroWatch if you haven't already been there. Good Luck!
I have to say, a lot of people are directed towards the "easier" distros such as Mandrake, or Fedora/Redhat, but I find the best way to dive in if you are some initiative, is to go right into a distro such as Gentoo or Slackware. You will have to read a bit, but they aren't that much harder, but teach you so much more much more quickly. With Slackware I rapidly gained knowledge in the power of the command line, rather than depending on the GUI, like we are in Windows.
Distribution: Vector Linux 5.1 Std., Vector Linux 5.8 Std., Win2k, XP, OS X (10.4 & 10.5)
Posts: 344
Rep:
I suggest that you consider Conectiva 10.
You will need to D/L all three disk for it since you are going to do a laptop install. You will also have to D/L the Updates .iso unless you have a really fast internet connection.
Conectiva uses Apt-get via Synaptic so installing and uninstalling software in this distro is fairly easy.
I recommend Conectiva because it is for those of us you just want Linux to work without a lot of hassles and "diddling".
It is also one of the most visually appealing distros that I have tried to date.
I started years back using SuSe6.4 and my "learning curve" wandered over RH 7.2 7.3 8.0 to SuSe 8.2 9.1 till recently I started with Debian (first Woody then) Sarge.
Debian Sarge might not be the easiest of distributions but it clearly gives you a good learning environment without much of the hassle i later had when i learned more and had problems configuring some of my network stuff
Also with 'aptitude' there is a nice front end to the package manager (also a nice one available under KDE)
I'm a happy Slackware user, and have probably used a dozen different distros.
That said, if you're interested in learning the basics of Linux as a user, without too many initial headaches, please consider a liveCD distribution like Slax, Knoppix, or one of the other, very well designed liveCD distributions.
Originally posted by cavalier I'm a happy Slackware user, and have probably used a dozen different distros.
That said, if you're interested in learning the basics of Linux as a user, without too many initial headaches, please consider a liveCD distribution like Slax, Knoppix, or one of the other, very well designed liveCD distributions.
An excellent suggestion. You can't mess much up when it's all on a cd. those will give you a nice feel for the OS before you really invest much time. A good way to tell if you are really interested in doing much with linux.
I have used Mandrake 8.x, Caldera and RedHat 7.2, 8.0, 9.0 .. Right now I m using RedHat Enterprise Linux .. I can't compare RedHat with others but my experience with RedHat has been great .. No hardware incomaptibility problems .. It supports all major software applications .. RedHat 9.0 was pretty stable and so is the Enterprise .. Basically a RedHat fan , u can say ..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.