Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,801
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by berndbausch
Linux systems are unlikely to have raw disk device files though. Reminds me of HP-UX.
I only recall some "Big Iron" UNIXes using them. Tru64 and Solaris had/have raw disk devices, i.e., "/dev/rdisk/dsk0[a-h]" and "/dev/rdsk/...". I can only remember Oracle as being interested in using them---supposedly for performance reasons.
Use whatever is convenient - I happen to use 4M; habit over the years, it has no particular logic behind the choice. Last time I did some tracing, the value has no effect on the actual I/O issued. On my old laptop with 512-sector disk, chains of 32-sector I/O were issued by dd - I didn't look to see what the I/O scheduler did in the way of consolidation of chains given that all the addresses were consecutive.
dd ends after about 1 or 2 hours of job with no warning.
but destination disk is empty !
I can't post anything today because remote acces is down.
I did't check "/" missing. may be a recopy of what I launched. to be checked.
EB
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,487
Rep:
For large transfers with 512MB ram, I'd use bs=300M, this will read & write your disk in 300MB chunks using that much ram for the transfers.
(Your system should work OK with the other 212MB of ram.)
Sorry for this question, but is /dev/rdsk/c0t9d0s2 a device file?
If yes, and if the command succeeds successfully, the two disk partitions should have the same content.
How do you check that the destination disk is empty?
Sorry for this question, but is /dev/rdsk/c0t9d0s2 a device file?
If yes, and if the command succeeds successfully, the two disk partitions should have the same content.
How do you check that the destination disk is empty?
Sun is equipped with 2 identical disks. 1st one is on slot 0 (c0t0d0) and the 2nd one in slot 2 (c0t9d0).
Slot 0 contains disk I want to duplicate and Slot 2 is destination disk.
dd command end but ls -al command show only 2 directories.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.