LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-02-2017, 06:36 PM   #1
mtdew3q
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: upstate NY
Distribution: fedora XFCE 24
Posts: 398

Rep: Reputation: 17
cloud based scanner - av linux


Hi-

Is it okay that a cloud based scanner is not fast? I am using comodo pro 10 right now. It seems really cool. The scanner is not really fast when you do a full scan. Can I just scan send it to the background and not worry about speed? I don't know if there is any advantages to having a scanner that is blazing fast like in Webroot or Malwarebytes. If there is no technical issue, I am going to use comodo for my 2 Linux installs in addition to Windows 10!

thx. -
mtdew3q
 
Old 11-02-2017, 06:42 PM   #2
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,460

Rep: Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604
whats wrong with using Clamscan on linux to scan for Microsoft viruses on Microsoft Operating Systems

ps there are only about a few dozen linux viruses ( and a few HUNDRED THOUSAND Microsoft viruses )

so say 36 VS 750,000

running intrusion detection software would be a better use of linux cpu resources than looking for WINDOWS viruses on a linux machine
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-02-2017, 06:59 PM   #3
mtdew3q
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: upstate NY
Distribution: fedora XFCE 24
Posts: 398

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
HI -

Well...there is this one http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-d...ief-steals-in/

I know there have been security vulnerabilities I read about too that go on for quite some time and then are discovered. I don't think Linux is impervious but I am a bit paranoid.

thx.
 
Old 11-02-2017, 07:03 PM   #4
mtdew3q
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: upstate NY
Distribution: fedora XFCE 24
Posts: 398

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
HI-

I use TK- clamscan with freshclam and it works well. Comodo might be worth a try.

thx.
 
Old 11-02-2017, 07:04 PM   #5
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,460

Rep: Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604
almost all viruses that can run on linux would need root access
and unless you run AS root that is rather hard for a automated bot to do ( a human -- well no os will stand up)

even the CIA can not stop 100% of the crackers 100% of the time

-- added later
you must like banging your head on the desk

the tk motiff gui is junk

the terminal is much much much a better option
and WAY more useful

Last edited by John VV; 11-02-2017 at 07:09 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-02-2017, 07:15 PM   #6
mtdew3q
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: upstate NY
Distribution: fedora XFCE 24
Posts: 398

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Hi-

I guess. I mean there are things like escalation of privileges with buffer overflows that still apply.

That isn't really my question or issue though. I am more interested in finding out about if webroot scanner or malwarebyte that can run in under 2 minutes flat really matters. I never saw a scanner like Comodo that takes many hours to do a complete full scan. I've seen signature based scanners, the old ones, that finish even on slow computers in 3 hours. Comodo has a scanner in the cloud that is REALLY slow. If speed doesn't matter in the end I happily will use Comodo.

If no one really knows or can't answer right now I will put it to the test. I am very curious about that scanner.

Thx for cool feedback-
jim
 
Old 11-02-2017, 08:37 PM   #7
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,460

Rep: Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604Reputation: 2604
a scan of say 3 or 4 TB of data will take hours

not too long ago ( 2003 - 15 years) a 128 gig drive was a normal big drive
today a 4 tb is small
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-02-2017, 09:13 PM   #8
mtdew3q
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: upstate NY
Distribution: fedora XFCE 24
Posts: 398

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Hey John-

Very cool news to report. Last night on the initial scan it must have taken 10 hours. Today it is on track to only take <=2 hours for my PC. I thought 10 hours for a regular Win 10 install (maybe like 100 GB) ? Crazy...right? It is much faster now! I am happy now that I picked comodo.

Have a cool night-
jim
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using shared objects (.so) with Java on Linux based Cloud cos.im.fiah Linux - Server 2 02-17-2011 08:52 PM
LXer: 5 Linux-based Cloud Businesses LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-07-2009 09:30 PM
LXer: Penguin unveils Linux-based HPC in the cloud LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-14-2009 05:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration