CD -buring Audio -Sound Quality , Regular VS. On-the fly???
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Started out w/Redhat 6.0,7.3,then Suse 8.2 , 9.2 ,10.open suse , KNOPPIX 2.73 &5.1 & Puppy
Posts: 164
Rep:
CD -buring Audio -Sound Quality , Regular VS. On-the fly???
hello fellow Linux users /techies....
I often wondered have any of you ever noticed a difference in the Audio Quality of CDs copied /burned in K3b with the regular procedure of a Temp file of the Cd/Wav files stored on Hdr Versus On-the -Fly procedure with two drives.
I often noticed some cd,s a Friend of mine listens/plays on her Stereo that are copies ( Hardware/OS used unknown-most likely Windows from Her Co-Workers). These Copies often have a "hazy sort of Phase Shifting sound"in the Background , anyone else ever hear this???
Not sure, but maybe they were resampled and / or re-encoded while copying?
Also, the sample rates may have been dropped by somebody inbetween if the audio was re-encoded. I also know some people like to add in some filters that might change the perceived audio quality if somebody else with more acute hearing listen to a playback...
Are the targets she is listening to MP3's or straight CD audio? I've never been able to hear it, but I've heard that some people with above average hearing or perception can tell when they hear an MP3, given that some almost-inaudible (to 90% of people) frequencies are dropped when encoding to MP3 (Fraunhoffer) as part of the compression strategy. (But then, other people say the same about straight CD audio vs. old style analog LPs.)
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,629
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rylan76
...(But then, other people say the same about straight CD audio vs. old style analog LPs.)
You sure can hear that. AFAIR there is a rather low cutoff frequency on audio CDs which vinyl doesn't have (but most musical instruments produce them)...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.