Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Thanks for the screenshot. The bootloader is installed in the directory "ubuntu". The odd thing is that there is a Microsoft directory. That disk was empty initially and you only booted Ubuntu USB and installed it. So, that's odd.
But anyway, does the ubuntu contain a ".efi" binary file?
I have an appointment here at 9 am, will be gone for several hours, if you have more ideas, please post them and will get back on this.
I did get this MB and this drive to install working copy of Mint WHEN, BUT, etc.. I had the other 2 drives with working ubuntu and windows 7 partitions installed in the machine. This machine has an UEFI error from the installer when their is only one drive in the system. My guess the other drives with functioning ubuntu that was installed on a different pc force installer to bios mode.
Ok. Thinking about your blinking white cursor, and knowing that the EFI partition contains that ubuntu directory, the bootloader does not load. It could be because it was not registered in the UEFI firmware settings.
So, assuming that EFI binary for ubuntu is at EFI/ubuntu/grubx64.efi, in order to register it in the UEFI firmware settings:
It placed GRUB at Boot0003* there and it is first in the boot order. It should have booted correctly, unless the EFI binary is not named grubx64.efi under directory ubuntu. Can you please check this?
I looked in the bios of the PC, it is set to boot from the 1TB hard drive
Why does the linux installer say the machine firmware has started it in UEFI mode? But there is OS on the harddrive in bios mode?
There is a bug somewhere.
Is there a way to force the linux installer to start in bios mode?
Last edited by sdowney717; 06-28-2017 at 06:41 AM.
Then maybe it is better you seriously look into all the settings in the BIOS to make the PC boot in Legacy Mode (i.e. no UEFI), then use gparted to create an empty partition table of type "msdos" on the hard disk and then install ubuntu. See if this works.
I was able to install to this drive and boot to 64 bit Mint when I have the other 2 drives in the PC.
But when I pulled the other 2 drives to update grub by chroot and other methods, grub errored on updating.
And never can get it to boot 64 bit linux with this single drive in the PC.
I run 64 bit ubuntu on this motherboard, but I suppose I can never reinstall it, if it crashes.
I would have to install on another PC, then put the drive back in this PC.
I brought my boat PC home, it has Mint 17.3 64 bit on it.
I will pull the drive and put it in here and see if it boots.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.