Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What windows is providing is a cached entry, not one from the server. That is why it is "non-authoritative".
This is done to minimize the impact on a name server by thousands of queries. When one tracks down your server, the host (well, name server actually) then caches the answer - so that your server doesn't have to respond any more (at least, not until the timeout interval happens). Over time, thousands of other name servers would pick up your entry - eliminating them from directly contacting your server, and in addition, spread the load out.
OCCASIONALLY, (not very often) I have pre-seeded other name servers by selecting them as a name server and then looking up the designated target. Doing this between the root servers and the intermediate servers between you and the root (there usually is only two or three), greatly reduces an initial load, and can reduce the occurrence of timeouts for users. It doesn't work well when the timeout is long though - the servers will only update after their cache entry times out.
What windows is providing is a cached entry, not one from the server. That is why it is "non-authoritative".
This is done to minimize the impact on a name server by thousands of queries. When one tracks down your server, the host (well, name server actually) then caches the answer - so that your server doesn't have to respond any more (at least, not until the timeout interval happens). Over time, thousands of other name servers would pick up your entry - eliminating them from directly contacting your server, and in addition, spread the load out.
OCCASIONALLY, (not very often) I have pre-seeded other name servers by selecting them as a name server and then looking up the designated target. Doing this between the root servers and the intermediate servers between you and the root (there usually is only two or three), greatly reduces an initial load, and can reduce the occurrence of timeouts for users. It doesn't work well when the timeout is long though - the servers will only update after their cache entry times out.
So weird tho all nix servers are fine (not on domain) all windows servers that are on domain are not doing its job
I thought to try some non-cached domain...on windows server by doing
nslookup
server 10.x.x.x
>zumba.com
and this is what I get back
Code:
02-Sep-2013 17:34:47.008 client 10.x.x.x#22547: query: zumba.xyz.com IN A +
(10.my.ser.ver)
where zumba.xyz.com (xyz.com) is my internal domain from windows server
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.