Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 01:05 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 235
Rep:
|
best linux for underpowered laptop
I have a Compaq Evo N400c...this thing is ancient, and I am wondering which Linux distro would run best on a limited machine. It is a 700 mhz CPU, 384 meg ram and 20 gig hard drive.
The only thing I absolutely must have is the latest firefox and thunderbird. Also, I would prefer to have a KDE desktop (although I can live with Gnome if necessary). I would also need to have some sort of community resource (like this one), and don't really like messing around with tarballs. I guess I am kinda picky.
I have already tried Mepis and K/Ubuntu, and don't like those. I am thinking Fedora 12, but would like to hear some opinions from you folks.
Please let me know your ideas and sugestions. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 01:07 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052
Rep:
|
BSD baby.
If that's too hardcore, go slackware.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 01:12 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267
Rep:
|
I second Slackware...with those specs, you'll probably not be using KDE or Gnome, though.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 01:13 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052
Rep:
|
Yeah, more like WindowMaker, w00t!
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 01:31 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Shetland, UK
Distribution: Slackware, Mandrake, LFS
Posts: 59
Rep:
|
I have a 300MHz Toshiba Satellite 4060xcdt with 64M ram. Slackware 10.2 with kde 3.4 runs fine, although larger programs are slow to load. I mainly use it for reading books, and find that even large PDF files are handled reasonably well.
At one stage it had 192M, but the 128M module stopped working. With that amount of memory it ran Slackware 12 and kde 3.5 ok.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:33 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,638
Rep:
|
Why are you after KDE and GNOME? Those both are resource hogs. You could try Debian with XFCE or Xubuntu. XFCE though light weight, will not give you a terrible feeling.
Dream Linux is one small Linux based on debian using XFCE. Small but looks good and works good as well.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:49 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Rep:
|
Try Puppy Linux
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:50 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: OpenSUSE 11.2, OpenSUSE 11.3,Arch
Posts: 240
Rep:
|
Well this is strange but i have noticed in one particular occasion that the RAM requirement is a problem only during installation.
It happened that OpenSUSE installation failed wen using 128MB ram so i borrowed a another 256MB ram module and completed the installation. The system booted without any problem even after i removed the 256MB module...
I think it was OpenSUSE 11.1 on P4 system... KDE is not "that" resource hungry.
I understand that this may not work on all low end systems... the point is this method worked...
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 08:53 AM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,960
|
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by firewiz87
Well this is strange but i have noticed in one particular occasion that the RAM requirement is a problem only during installation.
It happened that OpenSUSE installation failed wen using 128MB ram so i borrowed a another 256MB ram module and completed the installation. The system booted without any problem even after i removed the 256MB module...
I think it was OpenSUSE 11.1 on P4 system... KDE is not "that" resource hungry.
I understand that this may not work on all low end systems... the point is this method worked...
|
You are probably very patient. 'KDE' on the OP's equipment would be slow as molasses even if the memory is maxed out. Your 'P4' is probably clocked faster than the 700mhz laptop. Plus yours probably has other resources such as faster hdd which would have a better swap time.
I would suggest that the OP does look at Slackware and use a 'xfce'.
The above link and others can be found at ' Slackware-Links'. More than just SlackwareŽ links!
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 11:49 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052
Rep:
|
WindowMaker!!
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:43 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trist007
WindowMaker!!
|
Fluxbox! ;^)
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 06:57 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: MI
Distribution: Debian Slackware
Posts: 528
Rep:
|
My first first choice would be slackware also, really any linux distro would be fine just use a light Window Manager, ie. xfce, fluxbox.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 07:55 PM
|
#13
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,177
|
Try a few live cd's if they support that small amount of ram. The processor isn't bad.
I'd start with DSL.
Might consider Vector.
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 08:32 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Vermont
Distribution: Pop_OS!, RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu, Slackware
Posts: 40
Rep:
|
Since no one has mentioned it... SimplyMEPHIS works great on an older laptop I have, and ships with KDE 3.5.x.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|