@ lucmove:-
Quote:
I wouldn't recommend Puppy to anyone unless they already know what they're getting into and still want it for some reason.
|
Even as a long-standing Puppy user of several years, I wouldn't disagree with that. It's very different to mainstream Linux - so different, in fact, that it's considered 'odd' by most - but it's certainly very addictive.
I won't recommend Pup to beginners, and in fact won't volunteer advice unless the individual has made it clear they're serious about getting something to work. One thing's for sure; no two individuals have the same requirements for an OS, nor the same usage pattern when they've got it running. But the Linux eco-system is so vast, and so varied, that it would be truly surprising if most people can't eventually find something they like.
Pup has the distinction of making truly ancient hardware still usable; it's the only thing that'll run with any stability on my 17-yr old Dell laptop. A P4 and 512 MB of RAM makes you rather inventive, to say the least. But on new hardware, especially a top-end machine, it's
SO fast its feet don't touch the ground. We have at least 2 forum members who both bought top-end System76 hardware, 32 GB RAM, Intel Corei7's/i9s, pre-installed with Ubuntu.....and the first thing they did was to wipe Ubuntu off the drive, because they
hate it - followed by installing Puppy in it's place. You'd call them 'strange'; personally, I see them as folks who know what they want.
As for 'walled garden', well; let's just "agree to disagree" on that one. There is
nothing a mainstream distro can do that Puppy can't. Stat.
Mike.