Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-13-2006, 05:04 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Caernarfon
Distribution: Mandriva SE 2005
Posts: 11
Rep:
|
Best distro for home developement/file sharing server
Hi,
I presently connect to the web through a Linksys modem/router, which also provides a wireless network in the house. My desktop (WinXP/Mandriva SE2005) connects via ethernet, and I have a laptop connecting wirelessly.
I want to set up a server on the network, so I can use it for my web developement and perhaps for filesharing later on. At the moment I am unsure which kind of distro would be the best to run the server. I have copies of Mandriva SE 2005 and Ubuntu already, but I am unsure if they would be the best option. I know that RedHat and Fedora are the most popular OS's, would these be better?
My goal is a LAMP set up.
Thanks,
Mei
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 05:23 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Bremen, Germany
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 303
Rep:
|
It really doesn't matter which distro you use. The only important thing is that you know your way around the distribution enough to be able to fix things when they break.
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 05:32 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576
Rep:
|
Hi and welcome to Linuxquestions.
If you want a rock solid server you should pick Debian Sarge. Depending on what hardware you have you could pick a light running distribution like Vector or DamnSmallLinux, using one of those will give you ressources for server use.
Fedora is good and easy to use but it holds alot of new software - often beta versions. That means that you should be ready to fix things by hand once in a while.
Redhat reached its 'end of life' some time ago, so you wont get any new updates if you pick that one.
Good luck and have fun.
Sincerely, Jørgen
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 07:21 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Caernarfon
Distribution: Mandriva SE 2005
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for your replies.
I read somewhere that the GUI should not be installed. Should I follow that advice?
I think I'll try what I've got at the moment to start with.
Cheers,
Mei
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 07:53 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,272
Rep: 
|
The reason it is recommended not to use a gui is because they take up precious system resources that could be put to better use.
I'd recommend you use whichever distro you have most experience with. If you feel that maybe another distro would better suit your needs, get it installed on a test machine first and get aquainted with it before putting it on your 'real' server
If you want to go the Redhat route then use something like CentOS or WBEL which are clones of Redhat's Enterprise OS
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 08:28 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 345
Rep:
|
I'd have to recommend Slackware for a server.
It's rock solid stable, and it's the quickest and most painless install that I'm aware of. It doesn't even boot into a GUI by default!
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|