Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I wanted to install red hat 7.3. I did. I wiped out my partition for windows and then installed red hat. Success. After that, I play around, and then decide its time to install that crummy windows xp so that I can play all my games. It says that I can't install it without wiping out one of my partitions. It has a maximum of three that xp allows. I see the root partition for linux, and the swap. I also see a mysterious 500mb partition for who knows what. I delete it . Dumb idea Anyways, windows works ok, but does not show the dual boot screen like it promised. I am left with a half partitioned hard drive, and no access to linux. Now i think to myself, i can delete the linux partitions, make them unallocated, and then install red hat again, and use lilo as the boot manager. Wrong again. I can't boot into the installation with my cd anymore. The first time I attempted this, it said that windows had an error, and that I could insert the windows cd to fix the problem. Well, I try again, and now it just simply boots to windows without giving me the choice to boot from the cd. It is just completely worthless. Says no boot record for cd, goes to flopy, and then hard drive. Nothing. I try to boot into the windows xp cd. And guess what, it works. Is this a windows issue? A hard drive issue? Not a cd rom drive issue. BIOS problem? How do I fix this stupid mess up? I have another hard drive, and can install windows or linux, or whichever on it, but the problem is that I cannot boot into the linux installation cd. I would prefer to have windows and linux on the same hard drive but different partitions.
If you have nothing that you can't get back easily (that sentence sucks, if you aren't worried about losing everything - translation) then format em all, blank em. Partition as you'd like, then install suckmycomputerXP and follow it up with RH.
Absolutely you only need to do the first HD. Nothing at the boot-level cares about your other disk.
I always do windows first. If you really wanted to be perverse you could do linux first, with a little fiddling, but it's really not worth the effort if you know you're going to want both.
I had the same problem too...........installed rh7.3 over winxp but the bootload GRUB cannot load........i just show "GRUB" with a black screen.......btw during installion if rh7.3 the duke reported tat my sda(winxp drive) is inconsistance, izzit normal?
1. Install WinXP on one hard drive (or primary partition)
2. Install RH 7.3 on the second hard drive (or seconday partition)
During the Install for RH 7.3, there is a bootloader configuration screen where you get to decide where the bootloader will reside. Use GRUB as your bootloader, put it in the MBR, and this is the key to making it all work: Make sure you give the windows partition/drive a label! That's the most important part because without a label, the Windows partition will not appear in the GRUB bootloader (although it is still accessible if you forgot to do this step) and you will not be able to boot into Windows XP.
I will add another post here with my grub configuration file so you can see how mine looks. I sucessfully set my computer up with two seperate hard drives. /hda is Windows XP and /hdb is my Linux drive. If you have more questions I would like to help.
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
# root (hd1,0)
# kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/hdb2
# initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/hda
default=1
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd1,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Kernel 2.4.18-10)
root (hd1,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.18-10 ro root=/dev/hdb2 hdd=ide-scsi
initrd /initrd-2.4.18-10.img
title Windows XP Professional
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
I know I shouldn't start this war, but here I go...
LILO and GRUB are of course, simply user preference, since now either one will work with any configuration (that I know of anyway). So...
GRUB really seems too "cryptic" and not really anything that makes sense. LILO might seem that way too, but if you look at lilo, and edit lines and "think" you know what you are doing from the sound of the line, most likely (if you know a little bit about linux) you are going to be ok. Example:
There's a line in some lilo.conf files called 'default'. What would the average user think that would mean when referring to a boot loader? Maybe the default OS. So making the entry 'default = winbloze' would cause winbloze to boot by default. And so on.
I know that grub is similar, and can do the same things, but it all just doesn't seem to fit well in the swing of things, to me anyway. Again, this is all simly user pref, and my pref is Lilo.
I am happy to hear arguments for the other side, just please keep em friendly
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
. Dumb idea 
Anyways, windows works ok, but does not show the dual boot screen like it promised. I am left with a half partitioned hard drive, and no access to linux. Now i think to myself, i can delete the linux partitions, make them unallocated, and then install red hat again, and use lilo as the boot manager. Wrong again. I can't boot into the installation with my cd anymore. The first time I attempted this, it said that windows had an error, and that I could insert the windows cd to fix the problem. Well, I try again, and now it just simply boots to windows without giving me the choice to boot from the cd. It is just completely worthless. Says no boot record for cd, goes to flopy, and then hard drive. Nothing. I try to boot into the windows xp cd. And guess what, it works. Is this a windows issue? A hard drive issue? Not a cd rom drive issue. BIOS problem? How do I fix this stupid mess up? I have another hard drive, and can install windows or linux, or whichever on it, but the problem is that I cannot boot into the linux installation cd. I would prefer to have windows and linux on the same hard drive but different partitions. 
