LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-29-2003, 08:23 AM   #1
polar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
apt-get kernel images


Hi,

Are there any advantages to using one of the kernel images in the debian repositories instead of using the ones from www.kernel.org?

Thanks
 
Old 05-29-2003, 09:24 AM   #2
snu
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: NRW
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
you want to say the kernel-source.
I think there is no difference than 2.4.18 is the latest stable version in debian eyes and not the 2.4.20.
2.4.20 is included in debians unstable
 
Old 05-29-2003, 10:19 AM   #3
markus1982
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Stuttgart (Germany)
Distribution: Debian/GNU Linux
Posts: 1,467

Rep: Reputation: 46
well you could add a unstable source to your /etc/apt/sources.list and then apt-get source -b kernel-source-2.4.20
 
Old 05-29-2003, 10:27 AM   #4
polar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 20

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the replies guys.

I understand that there are various version of the kernel in each repository and the kernel in the stable (woody) repository is older than the stable kernel at www.kernel.org.

I was curious why debian has the various version of the kernel in its repositories. Does it make upgrade the kernel easier or something?
 
Old 05-29-2003, 12:24 PM   #5
0x4B
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Nashville TN, USA
Distribution: Debian (I'm unstable)
Posts: 117

Rep: Reputation: 15
part of the reason the various debian releases have different kernel is that debian has fairly specific requirements for what qualifies as "testing" and "stable," partly based on time. If the new kernel hasn't existed long enough, it doesn't get into stable.
 
Old 05-29-2003, 05:48 PM   #6
iceman47
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Debian, Free/OpenBSD
Posts: 1,123

Rep: Reputation: 47
I say compile your own kernel
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
apt-setup?? local images mailbinoy Debian 2 07-18-2005 03:44 PM
Question about installing kernel images vinoloco Ubuntu 2 04-13-2005 02:14 PM
compiling same kernel with 2 different bootable images b123coder Linux - Software 1 11-19-2004 11:39 AM
debian kernel images dukeinlondon Debian 1 05-27-2004 01:08 PM
Kernel Images linux_baby Linux - General 1 04-22-2002 10:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration