About Linux bandwidth usage
Good day all. This is my first post, both my wife and I are considering switching to Linux for a mix of reasons. For starters there are the rumors of Microsoft's direction with Windows concerning the Desktop as a Service model, not to mention all the backdoors both my wife and I are sick of and in doing research we learned about how those backdoors don't exist in Linux due to its very nature. Though we'll likely still go to Linux regardless to the answer of this question the more we know the better.
Since Linux doesn't have the rootkits and security holes that Microsoft uses to take and sell user data in the first place does that mean ultimately Linux's core internet bandwidth usage is null in comparison to proprietary operating systems regardless of distro? |
Quote:
Quote:
you might want to rephrase your question. |
Quote:
Say your ISP can only provide 10mbps speeds and they are the only one in the area. Would two Linux computers take better advantage of those speeds than a single Windows 10 unit? |
the speeds and bandwidth available by the provider is not determined by the unit using it. if you can only get 10mbps speeds then that is all you are going to get. having two separate systems pulling off of the same 10mbps router they will max out at 10mbps no faster. that is not to say you max limit is 10mbps, and the sending side is only sending at 5mbps then you are not going to get 10mbps. if the sending side is 15mbps then you're going to only get 10mbps.
take better advantage of the 10mbps limit, I do not see why windows does not. what are you experiencing? this is a networking limitation not Linux kernel limitation. switching to Linux you no longer need to worry about viruses, having your operating system being taken away from you while updating the system. free apps that you can modify the source code if you want or need to. more desktops / window managers to pick from. you can turn it into a server, and more... |
Quote:
As far as back doors go, it depends on how paranoid you're willing to be - there are lots of eyes on the code, but how sure can everybody be? And even if the OS is secure, what about the hardware? What about the online services you use? Best to just stomp on the problems you know about and assume that computer crackers (the correct term for malignant "hackers") are always trying to break in. *"Your mileage may vary", but for a major upgrade I've always found a new install of the latest distro version easier and quicker than updating the individual components. |
Ok, thank you. I was just thinking maybe we'd be able to do more with our systems online if we weren't dealing with the huge amount of Windows background processes that send data back and forth across the internet.
|
Quote:
|
Ok, Thank You. I'll now look into what would be best for us then.
|
maybe pick up a pack of 8GB 4GB even if you can still find them, then install a few different distos on them . or just one USB Stick and a hand full of different distros, then burn one, check it out, then burn another one over top of the old one, then you can check out a hand full of distros while you're at it.
|
On an average Linux system, there is usually only a single software update system, though some do have things like snaps and flatpaks updating separately. Windows will have the OS, Virus Checker, Internet Security, Adobe updater, Chrome or Firefox updaters, and possibly several others. Add to that all of the Windows services, and a lot of things can be happening in the background. I believe that this was the intent of the original question.
On Linux, there ARE background processes which can use up bandwidth, but unless you have a load of desktop widgets, it is unlikely that they will take up much bandwidth, unless they are downloading graphics. As BW-Userx says, packet sniffers can monitor these things. One other thing that is worth bearing in mind is that 10Mbps is actually a LOT, unless you are watching videos. The only thing that should really affect an internet connection is if you have a Data limit for your monthly subscription. |
Quote:
|
It's not really so much the OS as the websites. The amount of data being transferred for spying purposes is quite small. But some 90% of web bandwidth is used to display advertising and other objectionable traffic.
|
Quote:
if that is a concern, then you should choose a distro that
the rest of bandwidth usage is what you as a user do or what internet-facing software is configured to do. obviously email and web browser and such do access the internet; there's no difference between linux and windows there. if you want to reduce bandwidth there, you might want to look into serious adblocking, maybe via /etc/hosts. |
Quote:
https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html https://advanxer.com/blog/2015/05/ad...nd-dns-server/ and a few others too. Unfortunately, you lose access to some sites completely. |
Quote:
Quote:
blocking through /etc/hosts is NOT a software solution, it's just a list of domains that your computer looks through before even consulting the DNS server. it's what computers were using (and still do) before DNS was invented. that's what makes it so elegant. still, various helper scripts to assist people with that (regular updates, level of protection etc.) do exist. i use gaenserich's hostsblock. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM. |