Just out of curiosity, I've been trying to decipher this. All three lines refer to the same process, number 2155, which seems to be a thread of your brave browser (apparmor name snap.brave.brave). It's trying to access information about the hardware device that contains your wallet (bus number, device number and report descriptor). In all three cases, read access has been denied. I assume fsuid refers to your own user ID number, because the first user on a newly installed system usually has the UID 1000.

Eventually you will need a file in /etc/apparmor.d called something like snap.brave.brave and granting specific read access to these three pieces of information.

1 members found this post helpful.

Makes sense, so maybe my plan to skip Brave and use Chrome is a good one. So far, my Chrome install just quits. Trying to figure that one out.

The problem isn't with brave; the problem is with apparmor. You need to add a configuration file that will tell apparmor to allow this access. Just changing your browser won't make any difference at all (except to the error message!).

1 members found this post helpful.

Well, thank you all for the help. I finally got it working. Launching the Keepkey client with google chrome got it to work.

I had a problem loading Chrome, I got it to work by using a terminal window to install, not the usual path with clicking on Google to download and launch.

Hazel, thank you again. If you would, would you remove the data from my unit in your post above please?

Hazel, pan, thank you so much. I have learned a lot and now , I think, have my Linux machine loaded with what I need for now. I truly appreciate the help, I was at the end of the road before I found this place.

Done. Actually you should edit code that you put up so as to remove anything personal before you post it. And if you find something helpful, please mark it.

1 members found this post helpful.

Thank you Hazel, much appreciated. I did edit some things out, did I leave more in that I should not have in your opinion?

No idea! But since you wanted me to edit it out, I assume it showed things that you didn't want to publish for security reasons. I merely pointed out that in that case, you should have edited them out yourself before posting.

1 members found this post helpful.