Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
10-27-2007, 11:57 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Hardy (Gnome on Ubuntu 8.04) on Compaq N600c laptop
Posts: 323
Rep:
|
A Simple Music Player that actually works?
Can't find one.
On a brand new Feisty Fawn trying to load a 96k mp3 stream .pls:
Totem -- clips like crazy (no, it wasn't the connection or the station)
MPlayer -- Playlist->Add->play->shows name of list and stares blankly at me, nothing else.
Amarok -- "No suitable Demux". Do they mean "decoder"? for an MP3? Are they kidding?
Rhythmbox -- Playlist->Add->queue all tracks-> zero tracks are queued; same stupid blank stare.
I hate to say such blasphemous things, but I just want winamp without microsoft around it. Why? Well...file->open->any file imaginable be it playlist, mp3, aac, movie file, or even a url. And it works--every time. If I want big fancy library functionality I have the option to start that new hobby, but if I just want a file to play--just want to hear music, that's all--it does it. Simply, and quickly.
Once again: file-->open-->foo.pls--> play the thing! Thats all I'm asking for. Is this out there?
Thanks.
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 11:59 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 684
Rep:
|
Did you already install the mp3 codecs? Ubuntu doesn't provide these out of the box for legal reasons, but gives great instructions for getting this stuff working on their wiki.
Regards,
Alunduil
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 12:06 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Hardy (Gnome on Ubuntu 8.04) on Compaq N600c laptop
Posts: 323
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alunduil
Did you already install the mp3 codecs? Ubuntu doesn't provide these out of the box for legal reasons, but gives great instructions for getting this stuff working on their wiki.
Regards,
Alunduil
|
I haven't manually. But then why was totem able to play it at all? Rhythmbox can also play them if I really coax it (i.e. copy and paste urls, etc.).
And why is an open format like mp3 not available for distribution? Interesting.
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 12:11 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Why do you think mp3 is open? It's licensed an patented. The only thing that has prevented lawsuits is that none of the companies involved have brought suit against the distro makers.
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Amiens, France
Distribution: Debian Etch,
Posts: 181
Rep:
|
Linux has an equivalent to Winamp - but it's getting a little long in the tooth now. It's called Xmms, and I believe you can actually install Winamp skins onto it. To be honest though, I've never thought that much of it. Perhaps you should try VLC. This is nice because it has the features you mention and comes complete with a full set of codecs. Personally, I prefer Amarok - which is a bit like itunes but more friendly to use. However, you'll still need the Lame package to read the mp3 format which is definitely not open source. The open source equivalent of mp3 is Ogg Vorbis: it's an excellent alternative, but for some reason isn't favoured by the music industry.
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 12:33 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 684
Rep:
|
Actually because XMMS is now deprecated they've started a GTK+2.0 project under the name audacious. You might want to try that before XMMS.
Regards,
Alunduil
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 01:08 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079
Rep:
|
Audacious and beep are both XMMS clones, so they would both work well after you install codecs
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 02:22 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Hardy (Gnome on Ubuntu 8.04) on Compaq N600c laptop
Posts: 323
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Wow...
Thanks for the correction.
So how does one install the mp3 codec for amarok?
And, dare I ask, er, uh, for aac plus?
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 03:07 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079
Rep:
|
you could try Automatix, or add the repositories yourself
|
|
|
10-27-2007, 04:07 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 489
Rep:
|
Following the directions here should get just about anything you can play in linux to work. I don't remember if aac is available or not (I've generally avoided that format).
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|