LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2004, 09:12 AM   #1
bluestorm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: london, uk
Distribution: redhat
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question windows or linux-based domains?


hi all,

i've been charged to to setup a domain-based network and want to know if i can use a copy of redhat es instead of windows 2003.

can it be done and if so what are the pros/cons over win2003?

 
Old 05-10-2004, 09:28 AM   #2
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
It is possible to use Redhat (or linux in general) as a PDC. I have converted a few office networks to linux servers. Typically I setup the machine with Samba (which will act as the Primay Domain Controller), apache (way better web server then IIS), postfix (e-mail), and a transparent SQUID proxy (for monitoring web usuage or just caching pages to save bandwidth). Linux is also very easy to setup as a firewall or to block things like AIM if you are interested in that type of thing.
 
Old 05-10-2004, 03:23 PM   #3
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357Reputation: 357
While it is certainly possible to setup a Windows-type PDC with Linux using Samba, it really isn't the best choice in some situations.

Windows 2003 is a much better PDC than Samba, but that it to be expected. After all, the Samba team is trying to emulate am extremely complicated, closed-souce system. Because of that, they are a few years behind Windows in terms of PDC features.

Samba can now pretty much perfectly emulate a Windows NT4 server (NT was released in 1995). It will probably be quite a few years before it can properly replace a Windows 2003 server (or Windows 2000 for that matter). Active Directory is not supported yet (it can act as a AD BDC, but not as a AD PDC), which is the driving force behind Windows 2003/2000 servers.

Those are the cons, for the pros...to be honest I really can't think of any. Other than that it isn't Microsoft, if you are the type of person who makes decisions based on that.

I looked into replacing a Windows PDC with a Samba one, but after all my research, I really couldn't find a single advantage over using a Windows PDC (other than the advantage of cost, but in my case, we already had the Windows license, so cost was no longer a factor).

So it really depends on what you need to do. If you have a lot of users and machines, and you want Active Directory features, Samba just isn't an option at this point.

If you are running a smaller network, and are satisfied with running a NT4 type domain, then Samba might be the choice for you.

We would need more information to give accurate advice.
 
Old 07-01-2004, 01:10 PM   #4
tbeehler
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Washington State, USA
Distribution: Mainly RH 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: 30
We have a small (40 person) shop and Samba works wonderfully for us. However, if you do need advanced features, Samba may or may not work for you. We use it for a PDC, File server, Print Server and such and it's had an uptime in terms of months, rather then our old AD server's uptime of days. So I would ask that you do some research on what you need and see if Samba can make it happen for you. I picked up The Official Samba 3 Reference Guide from Amazon and it helped GREATLY! Windows is easy to set up, but Samba is WAY more stable.

Travis Beehler
 
Old 07-01-2004, 02:26 PM   #5
phatboyz
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Mooresville NC
Distribution: CentOS 4,Free BSD,
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 30
If you are looking to use active directory then use samba-TNG.
Just google for it. Only beta versions are running right now but they seem promising.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
windows emulators for PPC based linux? bonsai or die Linux - Software 2 05-07-2005 03:15 PM
linux-based windows restore cd?? win32sux Linux - Software 1 11-29-2004 09:47 PM
Linux-based Windows utitlies? mykrob Linux - General 3 08-12-2004 11:08 PM
running windows based programs in linux gambit Linux - Newbie 3 05-17-2004 08:49 PM
linux networking on windows-based network question direstraits Linux - Networking 4 05-24-2002 09:01 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration